Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

KarenL
Lv 6
KarenL asked in Politics & GovernmentElections · 1 decade ago

What IF the SCOTUS Finds BHO ineligible to be POTUS?

It was announced this evening that SCOTUS is reviewing the case Hermenway case. This case questions whether Mr. Obama provides sufficient proof of his natural born Citizen status. If the court rules in favor of Mr Hermenway. Who would succeed BHO? Should it be Bidden? He however, had to have known that BHO was ineligible but acquiesced to the Fraud. All Sect. of State for the Several States failed to do due diligence so I can see each of them being either impeached or sued for misfeasance, malfeasance, and nonfeasance of duties.

What would be the legal thinking and who ought to be punished. Would all of the laws passed by Congress and signed be null and void?

Where are the legal eagles on this?

Update:

Well, if this is "settled" Law why would SCOTUS even review it? Per statement from various Hawaiian sources --- no one has seen the documents that would have been used to produce a "Certificate of Live Birth", a document, to the best of my knowledge, DID NOT EXIST in 1961. In 1961 the idea of "identity thief" was unknown. Social Security Card still read "FOR TAX PURPOSES ONLY NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION". Full Face and Credit does not extend to FRAUD. A bogus state Bond, even if attested by voice by a Governor, is still bogus and if the 50 other Sect. of State did not do their due diligence, that misfeasance is not excusable. Per your logic: Bernie Madoff should be free since the SEC allowed his scheme to continue for years despite numerous warnings.

7 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Where have you been?

    The Supreme Court doesn't even entertain the nonsense that President Obama wasn't born in this country.

    So the SCOTUS won't be finding him ineligible any time soon.

  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    Funniest component.. My boss, Mr. company usa is a heavy Republican supporter, best contributor in our state actually, and completeyl against Obama. So right this moment I ask him what he thinks of all this, and he is going "What? i've got in no way even heard of it, it incredibly is ridiculous"... and that i say "incredibly? anyone's conversing approximately it, it extremely is in all places, a huge to do.." And he only laughed and reported "i think I only don't get my information from the internet.." Zing. I forgot that this 'massive' tale is only 'massive' on the internet and shows like Rush the place you may assume to pay attention approximately conspiracies and whatnot. And no, i does no longer rebellion, whether it won't take place, because of the fact they have already governed against the stay, and that they are unquestionably in basic terms ruling on wether the smaller courts could pay attention the case or no longer, i does no longer rebellion because of the fact whether a stay replaced into ordered it may well be some 10 minute stay till they referred to as Hawaii and shown his delivery certificates and lifted the stay.

  • 1 decade ago

    The legal eagles say this is all nonsense. You are referring to Hollister v. Soetoro, et. al. The court has already denied cert for this case (dismissed without hearing), denied the petition for recusal, and now has docketed the petition for rehearing. ALL petitions get docketed. (See answer at: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ag5R8... ) Less than a handful of cases in the history of the Supreme Court have been granted a rehearing. The court won't hear this one, either. It will be dismissed without comment.

    If Obama were found to be ineligible, he would be impeached. Courts can't remove him as the Constitution says that Congress must impeach and convict a sitting president. Obama ia a sitting president under the Constitution as he was elected and "qualified" by the Electoral College and accepted by Congress, All his official acts would stand (google "de facto officer doctrine"). Biden would be president, until he was impeached. The State Secretaries of State would not be impeached or successfully sued (some of the 80+ eligibility cases were against various Sec. of State, all dismissed) as they all followed the laws of their States, none of which required them to do any checking of credentials.

    ALL petitions get docketed. That's why it's on the schedule for review.

    The Republican Director of the Hawaii Dept. of Health has said (and testified before the Hawaii Senate) that she personally has seen Obama's original birth certificate and he was born in Hawaii. http://hawaii.gov/health/about/pr/2008/08-93.pdf In 1961, birth certificates in Hawaii were called Certificates of Live Birth. http://state-of-the-nation.com/wp-content/uploads/... The COLB that Obama posted (and Factcheck photographed) is the form they've used since 2001. http://nobarack08.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/birt... Here's my research on Hawaii birth certificates: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AthgA...

    It's full FAITH and credit, not full face. Fraud must be proven, not merely alleged. Hawaiian officials say Obama was born there, contemporaneous newspapers have the DOH-issed birth announcements, Obama's name in in the proper birth index. The Department of State in 1967 and in 2009 said Obama was born in Hawaii. http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2010/08/its-raining... page 38 , and http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/...

    Source(s): Plenty of research.
  • Teekno
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    He has provided a certificate of live birth.

    Under Hawaiian state law, it's sufficient documentation to prove birth. And such proof is the burden of the states.

    The Supreme Court won't find him ineligible, because the State of Hawaii has already declared him eligible, and the other 49 states are required to give full faith and credit to that documentation.

    Whoever told you differently was lying to you.

    EDIT: SCOTUS isn't reviewing it. Whoever told you that lied to you as well. You should ask them why.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    And if they rule Obama is a legal citizen, will all the crazies stfu about it?

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    President Biden?!? I'm not ready for that!

  • 1 decade ago

    You are completely insane or with malice intentionally trying to destroy whatever intelligent debate may arise here. Please go away.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.