Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Does this sentence make sense?

Hi, I have an assignment due tomorrow (an upper year History course in university), and I have to analyze a book I was assigned. One of the parts is to make note of any spelling or grammatical errors I find. I think I have found such a mistake but I want to make sure. The sentence:

The second incident involved one man, Alex Sandula, a mechanic who, unawares, picked up a “rabbit,” a piece of fuel rod that having passed through the reactor neutron flux then ricocheted off the shielding and onto the floor.

My immediate reaction was that "unawares" was mistaken for "unaware". I looked up unawares and saw it meant unsuspectingly...

But the second part of the sentence looks like it's missing something. A verb maybe? Flux can apparently be a verb: to melt, but seeing as the sentence is past tense, shouldn't fluxed be used instead?

Thanks in advance!

2 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    it'd make more sense to put dash's in there.

    The seceond incident invovled one man, Alex Sandula- a mechanic- who, unaware, picked up a "rabbit," a peice of fuel rod that having passed through the reactor neutron flux, then ricocheted off the shielding onto the floor.

    even then, this still doesn't make sense to me.

  • Rose
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    What you have done is fine. I would just put in a comma after 'flux'.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.