Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
what is the best hard drive defragment program?
What program does the best job of defragging a hard drive. Which one shows the drive accurately, defrags until there are zero fragments, etc. Back in the old days(win 95/98) the included defrag showed the drive better than xp or vista and did a better job anything like that out there today?
If you are going to answer, please include the name of the program. And if you want to say Defragging is not necessary, get a clue, or some training. I have been into computers since 1975 so I happen to know a thing or two. I am just looking for ideas from people who have had experience with different defrag programs outside of Micros*it.
6 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
I personally prefer one of the fully automatic utilities that can be set to run in the background. They need no scheduling and can also defrag very well under low free space plus have a nice GUI.
- ?Lv 71 decade ago
Let Windows handle it. The benefits of defrag are greatly exaggerated.
Edit: I have many clues, grasshopper. This is a controversial topic with many different conclusions. No one has said it's unnecessary, just that the benefits are greatly exaggerated.
"My favorite oft repeated quote from PC World.
When the PC World Test Center set out to determine the effectiveness of the defrag utilities in our set of suites, plus that of Diskeeper 8 from Executive Software, our analysts found no evidence that defragmentation enhanced performance. On a desktop system from the PC World office with a heavily used, never-defragmented hard drive, the lab conducted speed tests using a range of applications before and after defragmenting the drive with each utility. In the end, the Test Center saw no significant performance improvement after defragmenting with any program. This result flies in the face of the received wisdom that fragmentation hinders performance, though much older PCs (with slower and smaller hard drives) and heavily used servers may benefit more from defragging.
We used to say that defragging would speed up a system, but with today's larger, faster hard drives, that no longer seems true.
The PC World Test Center's tests reveal that defraggers don't actually improve performance. And Steve Gibson, president of PC consulting firm Gibson Research Corporation, confirmed our findings"
- ?Lv 45 years ago
domicile windows personal defrag is the ideal. To make it faster ensure their aren't any classes operating contained in the heritage. (use/press ctrl+alt and protecting them down hit the del key) all the progs that arise must be ended except for explorer. doing away with those means the defrag isn't having to restart everytime a software queries it
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- 7 years ago
Defraging itself might not improve the speed of the drive, however most modern hard drives are constantly doing error correction (ECC). If a part of the hard drive hasn't been read in two years the hard drive has no idea that the data is fading. By running a disk defrager you force the hard drive to examine it'self and re-write fading sectors. The only way PC World could test multiple defrag software is to clone the drive of a computer and test each product. Well the cloned drive has freshly laid bits that don't need as much error correction. Thus they would only see the original benefit of defraging. That's my theory at least.
- 1 decade ago
I would stick with windows defrag software any other defrag software could screw up your registry.