QB Stat line comparison?

Well, I think you have to look at the stats individually. Based on each statistic separately, I would go with A, and here is why:

QB A which was Michael Vick as someone else pointed out, was more productive than QB B which was Kyle Orton. You can see that with the passing yards. But notice the 11 fumbles by QB B. I don't think I would want a QB under center that fumbled that many times. Although Orton had a better QB rating and completion percentage than Vick did, I believe I would go with the QB that was more productive, didn't turn the ball over as much and gained more yardage. Vick had roughly over 600 yards passing than Orton did which means he was more productive in the passing game. So basically my point is, I would go with the person that is more productive overall. Vick had a lower percentage and QB rating in part because of his injury and being out of the game. Also, he still ran the ball with his legs which will cut down on his passing percentages. But again, you have to look at who turned the ball over less and who was more productive and I think it was Vick.

i think of Russel Wilson is larger than he's given credit for. yet, the offense for the Seahawks revolves around Lynch. success drives the deliver in Indy and has delivered the gang out of the cellar. So he's evidently going to be regarded at as a savior for that group for the perfect turnaround. Like somebody else suggested Griffin and Doug Martin have been the two maximum astounding offensive newbies for my section. Griffin isn't making blunders and putting his group in place to make a run on the playoffs. He gets my nod for ROY if I had a vote. tremendously darn good QB rookie classification this 365 days.

I would take QB B...

You forgot to mention that QB B (Michael Vick)also had 676 yards rushing, and 9 rushing TDs...

QB A (Kyle Orton) had 98 yards rushing, and 0 rushing TDs...

Is the QB B still in the same team and still having those biggest playmakers?

if not, i go with QB A at any time.

I'd take A, not only because of the good stats with no team, but also because he was taken out by coaching decision where as B was out due to injury. You should have mentioned that in your question because I believe you have to also look at the fact that B has a much higher likelihood of being hurt and in that case I think you need to figure in how good his backup is too.

I'll take the a Pro Bowler that is also extremely fast, which you forgot to mention.

I would take B. One less game and one more touchdown. Also three less interceptions. Although he had a lot of fumbles he only lost three. Also more efficient and a higher rating one again in less games.

B