Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Hector
Lv 4
Hector asked in Society & CultureRoyalty · 1 decade ago

Royal wedding a disgrace?

Does it bother anyone that Middleton is a commoner with not a drop of Royal ,noble,or aristocratic blood?Are you telling me that someone like the Princess Royal,and the Duke of York might actually have to curtsy or bow to this woman of no importance.The Royal family tree will be polluted with this blood of this woman.Is there anyone equally outraged by this disgrace.I think William is being very selfish and forgetting he has a duty to marry someone with important blood.

32 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Firstly Hector you must be some sort of snob who lives in cloud cokoo land

    There is no such thing as royal blood it is a myth spread by monarchy fanatics to fool the british public into believing that lie.

    The monarchy relies on the ignorance of the british people who are raised as gun fodder to protect the royals and i can remember when i was a young man being paraded on the sea front waving a little flag which my parents had to pay for as well as the obligitory mug when Princess Marina visited the town,since then i have grown out of this silliness and learnt to think for myself and realise that this family is a bunch of spongers and have no thought for the people of this nation as long as we keep them in luxury

    As previously stated by others the royal family is in danger of inbreedng to the point where we see Prnnce Charles who is a total buffoon telling really qualified people their business,and Andrew who has been subsidised the tune of four million pounds to visit other royal families under the guise of selling british business to them,what a load of nonsense,industry has people far more qualified to do that.

    The royal marriages have all been a total disaster and Prince Chrles made a mockery of this institution by admitting he was bedding Camilla nights before he was vowing his betrothal to Dianna,so perhaps some knowledeable person can tell me are this family an example to this nation or am i so senile i do not know right from wrong.?.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Mark Phillips who was Princess Anne's husband was a 'commoner'. So was Sarah Ferguson who married Andrew. But at the end of the day is the royal family a good advertisement for marriage? Royal divorces seem to be as common than royal weddings. I'm really not that bothered, beyond wishing them, at the basic human level, that they will be happy together.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Well hector

    you have actually got it all wrong, the reason why is the same as why his father married Diana.

    too much inter breeding produces problems in the royal family the madness of george the forth was due in most part to the over breeding with in the royal family.

    so some common blood is a really good thing.

    so we have the likely situation yes the the princess royal will have to do the royal thing and she will not mind she is a real person not a plastic one.

    as to the others they may well have issues but he will be king.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    No. It doesn't bother people that she's a commoner. In fact, it's good for the line. And all the other royals have married commoners: Princess Victoria of Sweden, Prince Felipe of Spain (and his sisters), Prince Albert of Monaco, King Abdullah II of Jordan, Crown Prince Haakon, Crown Prince Frederick,

    Akihito. Royalty marrying commoners is all the rage.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    I heard it said that the Middleton family had great reservations about her marrying into this firm of dysfunctional inbreds, and she herself once broke off the engagement because she could not face the hounding from the paparazzi and the brainless adulation that finally killed off her fiance's mother.

    They are a Christian family though - Prince William is lined up to be head of a church one day - and one principle is that Grace is bestowed from one spouse to the other, when they are united in marriage. This means that, at present, she is the commoner descendant of a coal miner, but on marriage she is bestowed royal status by her husband.

    Since there are no serious shortcomings about Kate Middleton - she is no Wallis Simpson - and the worst they can pin on her is that she bagged her prince by parading in front of him in a see-through dress - I see it can only benefit the Royal Family. It introduces some hybrid vigour, and also provides a link with their common subjects. In marriage, she bestows too her commonality onto her husband.

  • 1 decade ago

    YES, the royal wedding is a TOTAL disgrace.

    There wasting millions of tax payers money, which could pay for education and health services.

    The REPUBLIC of Great Britain will not tolerate such insolence from these people who still claim our country as their kingdom.

    The monarchy should be abolished and a president of the new republic elected.

    we're living in the stone age with these royal idiots.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    If I were you I would brush up on your genetics. Polluted by non Royal blood.

    The reason why Princess Diana was so favoured at the time was to widen the Gene pool.

    In breeding leads to backwards people, Kate Middleton fits the bill a treat, and the majority of people like her, and that is what counts.

    Or perhaps you are too inbred yourself to realise that ?? Important blood that sounds like the those pathetic Continentals who insist on being treated as Royalty with no country who wants them LOL.

  • Anonymous
    5 years ago

    i'm going to form this very slowly which you would be able to know it. Nick Griffin replaced into no longer invited to any backyard occasion at dollar Palace. A BNP councillor replaced into invited, alongside with the different councillor, and he had a +a million value ticket. He chosen Nick Griffin as his +a million and the invite replaced into subsequently withdrawn. So in the previous you flow off on little rants try to tutor your self. you purely be waiting to look dumb!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    No, of course it isn't. Five hundred years or so ago the monarch would elevate commoners through the ranks of nobility and aristocracy, if they did a big enough favour to the monarchy, so they are just commoners with an aristocratic title. If you like I will elevate you through the ranks. Rise, Hector, first Duke of Snobbery, you may now wear a silly little hat and some skunk skins. I do hope that this has helped.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Royal blood is no different from anyone else's blood. Centuries ago, the families of people with titles were often quite ordinary, because family fortunes have risen and fallen over time. (Back in the 14th century, Diana Spencer's ancestors were farmers.) Someone at some point did the King a favor and voila! He got a title! But it didn't alter the composition of his blood or of his descendants' blood.

    Moreover, precisely because family fortunes can change, a lot of working-class people in the UK can claim royal ancestry. Catherine Middleton is one of them.

    But then, trollers don't care. They sort of operate according to a "Don't confuse me with the facts" mentality, because facts ruin their fun.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.