Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Kate MIddleton commoner disgrace?
Is it not a disgrace that William first noticed this Middleton person in a sleazy lingerie show half naked?And can you imagine Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon ,or Lady Diana Spencer disgracing themselves on a catwalk.Diana Spencer was a descendant of four English Kings .While Elizabeth Boews-Lyon was an acceptable Scottish aristocrat.This MIddleton is a woman of no importance.Shame on William for embarrassing the Royal family like this.I dought Princess Margaret ,or the Queen Mum would have approved of this disgrace.
25 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Yeah, the thing she wore at the fashion show was a disgrace. Surely someone like that shouldn't join the royal family.
- ?Lv 45 years ago
She's a commoner yet no longer the 1st commoner to marry into the Royal family individuals. Technically the two Diana, Princess of Wales and Queen Elizabeth, the Queen mom have been commoners even however that they had courtesy titles. to boot Charles's 2d spouse The Duchess of Cornwall grew to become into born untitled If and whilst Charles ascends the throne she would be able to technically be Queen Consort of the united kingdom whether or no longer she makes use of that call (in simple terms as she is now Princess of Wales yet does no longer use that call).
- OllyLv 51 decade ago
There are many; here is a small sampling(peers are not royals,they are commoners,meaning NOT ROYAL,so any one titled Lady is a commoner,an uncommon commoner,but a commoner none the less.No peer-wife receives royal escorts to their weddings;they use police escorts until after the wedding when they are royal wives.
George VI married Lady Elizabeth Bowes Lyon.
The Prince of Wales married Lady Diana Frances Spencer and Camilla Parker Bowles.
Prince Andrew married Sarah Ferguson.
Prince Edward married Sophie Rhys Jones.
Princess Margaret married Anthony Armstrong-Jones.
Princess Anne married Mark Phillips and Timothy Laurence.
Prince Richard,Duke of Gloucester married Birgitte van Deurs; his father Prince Henry,Duke of Gloucester married Lady Alice Christabel Montagu-Douglas-Scott.
Prince Edward,the Duke of Kent married Katharine Worsley .
Prince Michael of Kent married Baroness Marie Christine von Reibnitz.
King Abdullah II of Jordan married a Palestinian,Rania al Yassin.
Prince Regnant Rainier of Monaco married the well-to-do Grace Kelly.
The late King Hussein of Jordan married American Lisa Halaby who became Queen Noor.
King Edward VIII married Wallis Warfield Simpson.
Prince Felipe of Spain married news reporter Letizia Ortiz Rocasolano.
Prince Pavlos of Greece married Marie-Chantal Miller.
His brother Prince Nikolaos married Tatiana Blatnik.
Prince Alexander von Furstenberg married Alexandra Miller.
Crown Prince Frederik of Denmark married Mary Elizabeth Donaldson.
There are more.
Source(s): http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/n... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Bowes-Lyon http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=201009... - 1 decade ago
sure she is and anyone who thinks otherwise has got to be kidding themselves. The fact that she "caught his eye" by going out on a catwalk wearing a see through slaggy 'dress' well isn't that saying something about her...? And now she's walking round with her head held high wearing posh elegant costumes and hats pretending to be this classy lady but she'll always be a common tart she used to be before she entered the royal family. I'm not saying i don't envy her. I envy the money, the luxuries like everyone else but that's not why i'm calling her a stuck up tart. Nor do i think she's a disgrace to the royal family. I've got nothing against her as i don't know her but i just think the only reason she stood a chance with him is because of that see through 'thing' and i'm sure the money and the princess-to-be title got to her and turned her into a stuck up snob. I would never go out wearing that awful 'dress' in public and i don't think any self respecting woman would.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
He had actually been good friends with Kate long before the fashion show but he fell in love with her at the fashion show. if Prince william fell in love with someone without a title i don't see why that would be an embarrassments or a disgrace
- Anonymous1 decade ago
If having Multi- Million heirs as Parents, and going to the same University as Prince William is Common, let us all be common
- Anonymous1 decade ago
The Queen mother was a manipulating woman who first set her cap at the Prince of Wales (Edward V111). He was not interested so she settled for his brother.
As for Margret, her racy behaviour was an embarrassment to the Royal Family. Rumour has it that she had a child before marrying Armstrong Jones as she was `off the scene' for a long time. There is a photo of her wearing a swagger coat that shows that it was covering something up. Her antics with a 2nd rate ganster on Mustique were well documented as was her affair with Roddy Llewellyn.
Diana was no angel and had affairs galore with speculation about Harry's father still running rife'
The Ferguson trollop was the worst of the lot. Vulgar and cheap being the nicest words to describe her.
Before you rant about Kate Middleton, look up some of the Royals. They would not be out of place on an estate with the common people.
- AndromacheLv 61 decade ago
It's not that unusual, a royal marrying a commoner. Edward IV married a commoner, Elizabeth Woodville. Anne Boleyn was a commoner. It was the German House of Hanover that introduced the idea that a prince should only marry a princess.
Princess Margaret married a commoner, a fashion photographer. So I think she would approve!
It was actually a charity fashion show. The dress was made by an art student. It was not a lingerie show. Kate is a normal woman, that's what people like about her.
- 1 decade ago
I seem to recall Diana causing a furore very early on by having her photo all over the Papers in a see- through skirt , as well as all the other revealing things she wore ! And a quick perusal through the history of the high- bred aristocratic ladies in any European country will uncover conduct and morals of a very dubious kind - ' blue blood' does not mean virtuous and good !
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Yes. I hate blo*dy commoners. Spellcheck 'dought' . Your spelling is also a disgrace