Many people-on YA spiritual- who believe in Science and Evolution say: Christians are ignorant?

i admit there are flaws in evolution, but there are also flaws in religion too. Which religion is the right one? Is there really proof for God, like the same kind of proof you demand for evolution? How do we know the religions we have today won't someday turn into mythologies, just like the religions in the past?

IMO: there's no right answer so far, given the current knowledge. I can only say that evolution, based on current evidence, is the best theory we have available, but this may change as we understand more.

btw why do you keep quoting people who said those things before 1990s? At least give me some quotes from scientists active in 2000s, where advance genome sequencing have pushed our understanding of genome evolution!

Darwin.

You'll notice that he said that before the majority of the evidence of evolution was found.

EDIT

Yes it's true that science doesn't know everything but that's why it works. It investigates areas until more is known about them.

Just asserting that there's a supernatural explanation without showing evidence is lazy. When we come up against a question and we don't know what the answer is, all we know is that we don't know what the answer is. Nowhere is that evidence of a divine being.

I'm ashamed to say it but argument from ignorance (god exists because we can't explain that) was very popular in the past and even the brightest minds of the day would use it.

On the actual topic of the protein formation, that actually has nothing to do with evolution just like stellar formation has nothing to do with gravity. It's actually a fairly complex area of organic chemistry.

EDIT

Heribert Nilsson died nearly 60 years ago. Even in the last 20 years we've made huge strides. Before I write up a big article about transitional fossils, what is your idea of one? A mutant half chimp, half human? You don't seem that bad but you never know.

Sounds like a Charles Darwin quote mine.

You realize science has progressed (just a tad) in the last 150 years?

The discovery of DNA was just one confirmation of evolutionary theory, explaining HOW traits are transmitted from generation to generation, how mutations enter populations, etc. We already knew from Mendel that such traits existed, and from Darwin the effects these variable traits can have, but the mechanism for their transmission was a mystery, one that was constantly highlighted by creationists as "proof" the theory was untenable.

You don't hear them harping on that one anymore, do you?

"The number of intermediate varieties which have formerly existed on earth must be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory." - Charles Darwin

Science is a proven-reliable method for finding out facts about the universe -- it doesn't require any "belief."

Evolution (that biological organisms change over time) is an observed fact -- facts also don't require "belief."

The quote is a quote-mine from Darwin. If you'd bother to read the rest of the paragraph, you'd see why your quote-mine is dishonest and doesn't say what you're trying to imply it says. You've been dishonest in mining it (or ignorant, I don't know which) -- why should anyone listen to anything a dishonest person says? That quote was also written 150 years ago -- in case you hadn't noticed, we've found several million fossils since then.

All you did by posting this was demonstrate ignorance and/or dishonesty. Did you really think this was going to counter the claim that you're ignorant?

Peace.

One man says something without proof and that is evolution busted? That is why you live your life by one book - the gullibility factor. Try and impartial source of information. You are not making Christians look good, dear.

Edit: A 150 year old quote? That is what you are basing your information on? Oh, dear.

Sounds like Kent Hovind.

The strongest evidence for evolution is genetic; not fossil.

Darwin knew nothing about genetics.

Don't confuse Christians to bible fundamentalists. Only bible fundamentalists feel threatened by evolution and they are the ignorant ones.

Wow, a quote mine. What are the chances.