So Hilary's photo was edited out of the "famous picture"?

I don't think I agree with the term sexually suggestive, since I do not see how she could be construed as so either through that picture or any other time. I do however agree with their right to remove her from the picture, it might be different if there was any historical value but it is just a Hasidic newspaper and I believe has every right to print whatever it wants and or thinks it's readers want.

I don't think they should have printed the picture at all. It is worrisome that anyone would alter a historic picture, especially when it is just days old. Wonder if they did the same with any pictures of George W. Bush and Condoleezza Rice?

Crazy man Crazy. I like what we are saying here. I am going to try to get you 2000 more words for this story. Now it is up for the cover but don't tell the band.

They also edited out the other woman, who was just standing. They don't allow pictures of women on their newspaper, period.

The fundies of all Abramic religions (Islam, Judaism and Christianity) are all eerily similar.

LoL! That's the reason du jour eh? And you're sure it wasn't an AIPAC creation and a kickoff for Hillary 2012? The whole thing is so absurd, nothing would surprise me at this point... But I'm sure something will!

I think these Hacidic what eve they are are stupid and whats worse are sexist.. shame on them. This is supposed to be America!

Looks like we have our own home-grown version of the Taliban!

Obama and his coherts are government employees, so they were presumably viewing internet porn in that picture. Hillary recognized one of the actors, so she had a horrified look on her face. Out of modesty, the newspaper decided to omit her.

Hard to believe people would actually support those people !

Hillary and sexually suggestive just don't add up.