Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

BRUCE
Lv 4
BRUCE asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

Germany plans to abandon nuclear energy by 2022?

Europe's economic powerhouse, Germany, announced plans Monday to abandon nuclear energy over the next 11 years, outlining an ambitious strategy in the wake of Japan's Fukushima disaster to

replace atomic power with renewable energy sources.

Chancellor Angela Merkel said she hopes the transformation to more solar, wind and hydroelectric power serves as a roadmap for other countries.

"We believe that we can show those countries who decide to abandon nuclear power — or not to start using it — how it is possible to achieve growth, creating jobs and economic prosperity while shifting the energy supply toward renewable energies," Merkel said.

Merkel's government said it will shut down all 17 nuclear power plants in Germany — the world's fourth-largest economy and Europe's biggest — by 2022.

The plan sets Germany apart from most of the other major industrialized nations. Among the other Group of Eight countries, only Italy has abandoned nuclear power, which was voted down in a referendum after the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.

"As the first big industrialized nation, we can achieve such a transformation toward efficient and renewable energies, with all the opportunities that brings for exports, developing new technologies and jobs," Merkel told reporters.

The government said the renewable energy sector already employs about 370,000 people.

Germany's seven oldest reactors, already taken off the grid pending safety inspections following the March catastrophe at Japan's Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant, will remain offline permanently, Merkel said. The plants accounted for about 40 percent of the country's nuclear power capacity.

At the time of the Japanese disaster, Germany got just under a quarter of its electricity from nuclear power, about the same share as in the U.S.

"We don't only want to renounce nuclear energy by 2022, we also want to reduce our CO2 emissions by 40 percent and double our share of renewable energies, from about 17 percent today to then 35 percent," the chancellor said.

Many Germans have vehemently opposed nuclear power since Chernobyl sent radioactivity over the country. Tens of thousands of people took to the streets after Fukushima to urge the government to shut all reactors quickly.

A decade ago, a center-left government drew up a plan to abandon the technology for good by 2021 because of its risks. But Merkel's government last year amended it to extend the plants' lifetime by an average 12 years — a political liability after Fukushima was hit by Japan's March 11 earthquake and tsunami.

"The country is throwing its weight behind clean renewable energy to power its manufacturing base and other countries like Britain should take note," said Robin Oakley, Greenpeace UK's campaigns director.

Switzerland, where nuclear power produces 40 percent of electricity, also announced last week that it plans to shut down its reactors gradually once they reach their average life span of 50 years — which would mean taking the last plant off the grid in 2034.

Germany's decision broadly follows the conclusions of a government-mandated commission on the ethics of nuclear power, which on Saturday delivered recommendations on how to abolish the technology.

"Fukushima was a dramatic experience, seeing there that a high-technology nation can't cope with such a catastrophe," Matthias Kleiner, the commission's co-chairman, said Monday. "Nuclear power is a technology with too many inherent risks to inflict it on us or our children."

Should The USA Start Rolling back on Nuclear Energy Given The Risks with Nuclear waste and meltdowns????

What Do You think of Germany Taking the Lead on Renewable Energies?????

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/05/30/501364/m...

11 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Why Take the Risks with Nuclear Energy when we have clean renewable energy????

    Should The USA Start Rolling back on Nuclear Energy Given The Risks with Nuclear waste and meltdowns????---------YES

    What Do You think of Germany Taking the Lead on Renewable Energies?????-------I think its sad the USA is taking a back seat and the "drill baby drill" ppl r pushing so hard for a dirty risky energy.

  • JerryJ
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    This is typical knee-jerk reaction brought about by media hype to get ratings. In a few years they will back off because the alternatives are worse.

    http://bravenewclimate.com/2011/05/15/solar-power-...

    If anything, the situation in Japan shows how safe nuclear power is. Consider that forty year old plants were hit with an earthquake five times the strength they were designed for and yet they still shut down safely. The generators came on like they were supposed to when grid power was cut. Then the tsunami hit and the generators were wiped out. However, the battery backup still worked for the designed eight hours. The problem happened when no new generators could be put in. Even so the problems have been minimal--media scare mongering for ratings not withstanding.

    Here is an informative article describing the situation:

    http://bravenewclimate.com/2011/03/13/fukushima-si...

    And here is where you find current, factual status information:

    http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/tsunamiupdate0...

    Historical status:

    http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2011/fukushima...

    And a slide presentation that describes the effects:

    http://www.slideshare.net/iaea/radiological-briefi...

    And here is a chart that helps make sense of the numbers:

    http://www.xkcd.com/radiation/

    And before you come down on nuclear energy, take a look at coal. In the U.S. 20 to 60 coal miners die each year compared to zero nuclear power plant workers. Pollution from coal power plants kill over 20,000 people in the U.S. annually compared to about 100 people killed world-wide from nuclear power over the last forty years. The only thing coal has going for it is that it doesn't have "nuclear" in the wording so therefore it must be safe. It seems that most people have learned about nuclear energy from sci-fi B movies rather than from studying the science.

    http://frankwarner.typepad.com/free_frank_warner/2...

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5174391/ns/us_news-env...

    And don't thing that coal power is radiation free:

    http://www.epa.gov/rpdweb00/tenorm/coalandcoalash....

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=c...

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The whole world have to do this and than it is helpful. When just some countries do this than it has no effect, some countries would import it from other countries. And when they have problems like in Japan with there nuclear energy it would always go around the whole world.

  • Let's see. The United States has almost 5 times the population of Germany and 27.5 times the land mass. If Germany was a state in this country, it would rank 6th behind Montana in size.

    So what might be possible to do in Germany is not going to work in the US. And Germany needs to look closely at Spain. Their attempt to "go green" was an economic disaster.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Ingenious. They will shut down Nuclear Plants which produce 0 emissions and replace them with 100,000 windmills covering every sq foot of the country. After they find out that does not produce enough energy, they will buy power from neighboring countries, all of which will be produced by nuclear power plants.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    As Uncle Charlie would say( he's 90) Nuclear stuff is bad stuff. japan can vouch for that.I think Germany has the right idea why endanger your country and its citizens by messing with that stuff.

  • 1 decade ago

    This is a classified idea from Germany...they will not abandoned the nuclear energy until 2050....

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    the Germans will make it work. too bad we wont shut down nuke plants in the US and use more hydro and geothermal power

    after we have a major accident then we will stop nuke plants

  • 1 decade ago

    Taking down nuclear power plants and replacing them with windmills sounds like a retarded idea, to me.

    ~Queen Nancy Pelosi

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Every Western country should follow their lead.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.