Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Can someone summarize this and the unrest in Congo? Its about the historical roots to the unrest in Congo?

The root of the problem was the historical expansionism of the Prussian Military Class, and the territorial ambitions of the French. This resulted in a German conviction that it was their destiny to control all of Europe from the Atlantic to the Baltic, and an equally strong French ambition personified in Napoleon.

At the end of the Napoleonic Wars, the victorious powers (Britain, Austria, Prussia, Russia) created a 'buffer country' out of what is now the Netherlands and Belgium. This was intended to stop or slow down any further French invasions of Germany.

The new country had Protestants in the North, and Catholics in the South. They did not get on, and in 1830 the South split off, and declared independence as Belgium.

As a result of the enquiries started by this man and the Irish politician Roger Casement, the scandal became known internationally. Catholic missionaries confirmed the rumors about conditions, and an international parliamentary commission was convened. Ownership of the country was transferred to the Belgian state, and it became known as the Belgian Congo. Money (a large amount of money) was put into trying to develop the area, and to provide education to the inhabitants, but the size of the territory was enormous, and two world wars intervened. Also, too much remained of the old systems and attitudes.

When the Belgians left the Congo and gave it independence there were only 4 doctors in the whole country. It had enormous mineral wealth, which quickly became the target for greedy warlords both within the Congo and in neighboring newly independent states. Chaos has continued ever since.

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    You can find answers in these texts:

    Who was King Leopold II?

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Alq8k...

    The Berlin Conference

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtOfb...

    On Congolese Independence

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlYfK...

    Mind you that the scandal was exaggerated by the Anglo-Saxon world to hide the same situations in their own colonies.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    Terrorism isn't something better than a spread of guerrilla conflict it is vilified to teach the majority antagonistic to the movements of the minority it is winding up the terroristic movements. In different words, terrorism is purely unconventional conflict. that is reported as terrorism to make the folk committing the act look undesirable. what's the regularly happening rationalization for conflict/what are human beings combating over? elements, or in different words, funds, similar to in any conflict. as an social gathering, even as the Contras in considered necessary u . s . of america were combating antagonistic to the Sandinista authorities in Nicaragua interior the '80's, they were reported as "Freedom warring parties" by technique of the U. S. and were given help by technique of the U. S. authorities. The Contras did strive against the Sandinistas (at cases), yet also executed attacks antagonistic to civilians, which blanketed rape, torture, arson, and kidnapping. for this reason, they were categorised "terrorists" by technique of many different countries. like the keeping is going, "One guy's terrorist is yet another guy's freedom fighter".

  • ?
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    Pretty much the Belgians (like most of the Europeans) failed horrendously to advance anything in their colonies except for how much money they could pull out.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.