Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

10 Answers

Relevance
  • 10 years ago

    Yeah right. They just moved numbers around. I really want in on their scam operation. It's probably impossible to pay that money back in that time frame unless they are selling cars for triple what they are. In reality I'll bet they just took some bailout money from other sources and/or subsidiaries and used that to pay the bailout money that the main company received. That's what I would hav done anyway and thus scored a big PR event.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    "Regardless of the motive, this situation is a perfect example of the shenanigans caused by excessive government intervention in the economy. Being honest with the American people is not optional. The sooner these extraordinary entanglements between taxpayers and the private sector are over, the better."

    U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa

    "Grassley crows over ethanol vote", http://www.thehawkeye.com/story/grassley-061611

    The overwhelming vote Tuesday against ending ethanol tax incentives gives U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, hope for a reasonable compromise that will continue federal support for the controversial alternative energy.

  • No. They have not. What does that tell you about NBC?

    Using taxpayer money (TARP) to pay the taxpayers back is what happened, and the government gave GM $49 Billion in exchange for stock.

  • 10 years ago

    No they didn't.

    If I borrowed $20 from you, then returned $12, did I pay my loan back?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • nicoll
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    the issue is that the government gave away too lots funds to start with. i comprehend the pel-grant-to-own loan ratio specific as hell would not artwork 40 5 - to -7 for scholars. GM paying its own loan lower back is a stable undertaking. Giving them 40 5 billion funds became no longer.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    No they didnt. They got a loan to pay back the loan

  • 10 years ago

    They got MORE tax money which they used to pay back the TARP money. "Gee, Wally, how come I still don't have anything in my pockets?"

  • 10 years ago

    Paying it back from tarp(taxpayers money) isn't really paying it back.

  • 10 years ago

    NOPE...MSNBC is nothing more than an Obama SPEW center

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    Yes, and No. they paid part of it back

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.