Is the idea that AGW is a threat originate from the fight against Communism.?

Yes they do, there's also "religion" "followers of Gore" and various often repeated catch phrases about Kool aid and chicken little etc etc etc, I also seem to recall "alarmist are also rude and name callers, which is just a little funny in light of the above.

For them this is about throwing mud as much and as fast as possible to try and cover the fact they have nothing when it comes to addressing the real matter "the science" they chant "the hockey stick is disproved, the hockey stick is disproved" when it quite clearly is not.

The thing is with much of this nonsense they don't even seem to care that what they are saying makes no sense, takes ottawa's rubbish 'Russia?' is he serious, interesting theory small fly in said theory, Russia return to a level of moderate prosperity is built on it's oil industry, I would wonder at the logic of them starting a movement that would affect their own economy probably to a greater degree than it would the west, but then deniers have a pretty long history of not thinking their theories through.

Maybe ottawa said the Russian but meant the Chinese, but hang on their prosperity is built on the back of the western economy, again that's denier logic for you, sort of like the irish terrorist who threatens to shoot himself and then the hostages!

It doesn't matter where the idea of AGW originated. It only matters how that idea is being used and there is plenty of evidence to show that it is being used by "communists" and "Marxists" to promote their values.

One argument against this idea made by those who believe AGW is to point to the former Soviet Union and say they had virtually no interest in the environment which is true. See here: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Communi...

However, while the left didn't dream up AGW, they came to realize that AGW and other environmental issues were excellent tools for forwarding their agenda. See here: http://www.greenspirit.com/key_issues/the_log.cfm?...

Now that may be even worse. The left may actually care more about their ideals than the environment. Even left blogs acknowledge this: http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/02/6-green-le...

This is a good read: http://www.xomba.com/environmentalism_vs_communism...

I think the common definition of Communist is misleading in that it is not necessarily the end goal but a means to take control.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93WvhaSllm0

Exactly where are you getting your "scientific evidence" to debunk deniers?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMjoPL6kIm8

Edit; Forget about infrared absorbtion. What's the theory? Increased temps? Google temp. record fraud.

Here's your foil hat.

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/from-their-o...

Red-baiting is an American tradition that goes back as far communists themselves.

Over-simplifying arguments is a common tactic in both politics & advertising. (Hmm.....)

Does Lincoln corresponding with Marx make him a Communist?

No.

(Which actually happened, & he gave a few military commissions to radicals of similar stripes while rejecting a few of Marx's conclusions.)

Sadly arguing rationally with them does little, but keep it up!

If it wasn't for global warming Chicago would still be under a mile of ice.

Unfortunately, Cro Magnon people learned to make fire and the smoke from their campsites melted the glaciers.

It is one factor, but as you intimate, probably not than main factor.

Maybe conservatives need at least one enemy to keep them united, and when communism became less viable, AGW became an alternative.

No idea.