Would you be more receptive of AL GORE'S message if he didn't own two mansions and fly in jets constantly?

Yes. It has the odor of hypocrisy and also cashing in.

.

No.

I believe what seems to make sense and it doesn't matter what the writer, photographer, lecture does in his personal life. I find that most people are attracted to people they can relate to. Since most of the decisions about how we use energy in the future will be controlled by the rich and powerful, it is important for people with money and power to respect the messenger as one of their own.

BTW

How many average guys with a global audience do you remember talking about restructuring the world's economy?

I agree with the first guy, if the messenger doesn't behave as you'd want, that doesn't mean the message changed. Besides, he's hardly the only one saying it.

As far as the uber-rich Hollywood types go, they donate plenty of $ to whatever cause they think is important. I'd think a 'patriotic' rich Retardican would donate to the country he/she has made so much money through, if for no other reason than to keep the country going that they live in.

Possibly. He is a hypocrite.

Unfortunately I don't think people would be more receptive to his message even if he did practice what he preaches. Carter was made fun of for lowering the thermostat in the White House and running around in a sweater.

It's a lie that He has made well over 100 million dollars with . Never did fall for the lie. I like the joker hondo that used the term, proven science.

so not receptive of a liberal, him or anyother one.

I'm a Republican, and I still think we should get cars with high gas mileage. If anything, it will reduce demand for gas, which will lower prices due to Supply and Demand.

If it helps the environment in the process, that's fine too.

I listen to what science says, not Al Gore, and I think there's a good chance we are negatively affecting the climate. I think Al Gore is a terrible spokesman for the issue, and should bow out of it.

No. The lack of real evidence that we have anything to do with it and the constant stream of lies and buy-offs were real deal-breakers for me.

Some of the greatest efforts to help the poor have come from rich people who realize the system is not fair.

It would make him less hypocritical. But the man made climate change hysteria would still be junk science nonsense.

Yeah, its' kind of like the uber-rich millionaire Hollywood types who whine that the Republicans are the rich people.