Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Two different biblical accounts of the death of Judas?
Acts 1:18 With the reward he got for his wickedness, Judas bought a field; there he fell headlong, his body burst open and all his intestines spilled out. Everyone in Jerusalem heard about this, so they called that field in their language Akeldama, that is, Field of Blood.
Matthew 27:5-6 So Judas threw the money into the temple and left. Then he went away and hanged himself. The chief priests picked up the coins and said, "It is against the law to put this into the treasury, since it is blood money."
So which is it? And don't tell me he fell headlong from a hanging. That would be ridiculous. Besides, that still wouldn't explain the contradiction of what he did with the money.
6 Answers
- Anonymous10 years agoFavorite Answer
There are four gospels. That are accepted by the Church, and several others, that are not. Each one tells the story from a different point of view.
so which is it? How are we to know? It's been 2000 years!
- Teller Of TruthsLv 710 years ago
According to Matthew 27:5, Judas hanged himself. But Acts 1:18 says, “pitching head foremost he noisily burst in his midst and all his intestines were poured out.” Matthew seems to deal with the mode of the attempted suicide, while Acts describes the result. Combining the two accounts, it appears that Judas tried to hang himself over some cliff, but the rope or tree limb broke so that he plunged down and burst open on the rocks below. The topography around Jerusalem makes such an event conceivable.
Also related to his death is the question of who bought the burial field with the 30 pieces of silver. According to Matthew 27:6, 7, the chief priests decided they could not put the money in the sacred treasury so they used it to buy the field. The account in Acts 1:18, 19, speaking about Judas, says: “This very man, therefore, purchased a field with the wages for unrighteousness.” The answer seems to be that the priests purchased the field, but since Judas provided the money, it could be credited to him. “It was not lawful to take into the Temple-treasury, for the purchase of sacred things, money that had been unlawfully gained. In such cases the Jewish Law provided that the money was to be restored to the donor, and, if he insisted on giving it, that he should be induced to spend it for something for the public weal [well-being]. . . . By a fiction of law the money was still considered to be Judas’, and to have been applied by him in the purchase of the well-known ‘potter’s field.’”
- 10 years ago
Two different Judases, and they were both up to the same double-cross. What are the chances of that?
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous10 years ago
True, and you ought to check out the discrepancies in Jesus' resurrection.
- wefmeisterLv 710 years ago
They are easily reconciled, and nothing from the facts of one story negate veracity of the other story.