In light of the record temperatures around the nation this past July, would it be prudent for the northern?

Of course the problem is after global warming comes the ice age, a person can turn up the AC but you ain't stopping a mile thick ice sheet.

edit; I guess that is one way of looking at it but it would suck for mail delivery, you'd have a different address each day.

Why on earth would a greater population density have a positive effect on the economy?

Also, global warming means more flooding and more violent weather, both of which cost huge amounts of money in damages. It does not necessarily mean noticeably hotter summers or warmer winters--it's about global averages throughout the year.

No. The cost of global warming, for example, increased food prices, instability in countries that provide us natural resources, would make us too poor to travel very far.

Yes, in a few short years you will be able to raise cattle on ranches in the state of Alaska.

Is that what your question means?

You mean the cost of the liberal infection in this country?