Is the power the government needs balanced against corporate tyranny?

Checks and balance refers to the government and not corporations. Understand that our fore fathers knew that government can grow out of control and a system was set up to protect us against this. But now we have liberals like you who want to contort what this means.

If I don't like a corporation I can buy from its competitor. I fear big government, not big business.

We currently have an administration that is the most anti-business (except for General Electric) in history, and look at the economic mess that anti-capitalist attitude has gotten us into.

Checks and balances references our three branches of government. We don't need any more and we certainly don't need unions pretending to be about ensuring fairness. They want the power of increased membership and nothing else. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. The only tyranny we face is government running our lives.

"Corporate tyranny" pales in comparison to the tyranny levied by our government on a daily basis. That's why a smaller government is essential.

I am libertarian (true liberal free market capitalist) but corporate socialism (they are "owned in common") needs some progressive government oversight.

Balanced by bureaucratic and union tyranny?

Corporations check each other. It is called competition.

Thats what Jihadi radical terrorists want- did they brainwash you too to agree with them? they are good at that brainwashing stuff- have done it for thousands of years.

Bin ladens main goal for America was destroy Capitalism- just watch any video of the flag burning radical Muslims in the Middle east calling for DEATH TO CAPITALISM- They are using Obama and the liberals to do their dirty work for them!

Corporate tyranny? Why yes my dear, whatever you're liberal school teaches you.

another example of a liberal professor turning a kids mind to mush