are these the true intentions of palestinians?

yea pretty much.

Is it not true that

i) Israel has stated it will not pursue talks if they concern Jerusalem (not just the city, but the district)

ii) There will be no talk of major settlements dismantling

iii) There will be no talk of returning the Jordan Valley

iv) There will be no talk of border access for Palestinians

v) There will be no talk of refugee return to Israel and only limited influx into Palestine

Taba the Israelis backed out of. Oslo was supposed to be complete by 2000. Road Map called for a halt to settlements.

Has there ever been a time in recent history when peace talks were to take place while one side was in the process of illegally expropriating land? Illegally building settlements (and at a record pace)? When one side has been ruled time and time again to be completely in the wrong in its efforts of colonizing occupied territory?

It can not be stressed enough, that until recently Zachi was correct, all talks were based on 1967 borders; the Palestinians were lied to. Madrid, Oslo, Taba, Road Map, George Bush Sr, Clinton, George Bush Jr, Obama- all agree that talks should be based on 1967. However Zachi is complaining that the PALESTINIANS have given in- for nothing. Palestinians agreed to almost EVERY LAND CONCESSION and received NOTHING. Unless you can provide that the "Palestinian Papers" or either fraudulent or mistaken- and even Israel is not making such a claim.

Israel is not interested in negotiations- only the dictating of terms. How can people stand by and say with a straight face that Israel is in the right when they will not grant Palestinians citizenship yet will not allow them a state? When they allow their settlers to attack Palestinians and their property with impunity?

@משאלה אחת Taba, and the Israelis had to back out because they were facing an election and knew it would be the death of them in the Knesset- which it was.

I would love anybody to name just one event that Palestine offered peace talks. Why I ask? Because no one will not.

Palestine has been offered 3 times similar style offers and 2 state solutions and guess what? They rejected. Even Arafat rejected and then started the 2nd intifada. Palestine has made it clear that they will not recognize Israel as a Jewish state since it wants to disperse its refugee's in Israel. Palestine feels in needs the right to return to its homeland.

Israel will not make any official deals until Palestine promises not to fire any more rockets after the creation of its state. If the PLO was so worried about statehood, why don't they create a state with temporary borders? The Jews are smart and they know not to trust the world every again.

Right from the start in 1948 the Arabs tried to get rid of Israel and the Jews.

To this date, several more wars and intifadas have been launched against

Israel in an attempt to get rid of the Jews.Peace talks always broke down

because the Arabs wanted it all their way or no way. Plus they always want

preconditionss before any talks. Well 2 can play this game and if they think

by declaring a state is going to solve something, it won't.

This is Netenyahu, Prime Minister of Israel in a leaked video:

http://www.redress.cc/palestine/jcook20100724

He confess that all Israeli peace talks are just a bluff, and that was the case for the past 17 years of the so called negotiations when Israeli colonial settlements expanded all over Palestinian territories.

If Israel continuous with this colonial policy and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, then there would be no more moderates in the Palestinian leadership my dear friend. If you want peace, you should make them and the world believe that Israel can exist without East Jerusalem, West Bank (internationally recognized Palestinian territories) and without blocking the return of Palestinian refugees. This means no more Jewish supremacy on as much Arab land as possible, but civilized democratic state for Arabs and Jews. That is the only way to peace.

"Israel must do this", Israel must do that"...

Arabs, you may kiss Israel in the a$$.

What I liked most was the part when this arab clown says "if we say we want to wipe Israel out - it´s not acceptable policy to say so. Don´t say these thing to the world, keep it to youself." It´s with these scums Israel is going to negotiate about the creation of a "palestinian state"?

The only thing Israel should talk with palestinian arabs is about setting the date they must get the hell out of Judea , Samaria and Jerusalem. If they do not get out by this date, Israel must simply kick them in their fat arab a$$es so that they would fly out of the Jewish land.

There is nothing more to talk about.

I have watched the interview .....nothing wrong with what the Man said,Abbas Zaki.......All what he is saying ...that if somebody have some thing like he wants to destroy israel ....let him keep it for himself and do not talk about it...................................................................I wish netanyahu say the same to Lieberman.....

.Arilou abu shaf.....do not take the man words out of contest.

@arilou.....No he did not....again what he is saying.... IF we say........meaning the other people who are saying "we want to destroy israel......" this will only harm the Palestinians cause..........

Arilou ...ask some body who do understand Arabic language.....I am sure he will confirm my translation........

Zbalah does not mean scumbag; it means garbage, so the clip is False Hasbara. The true intention is to boat the Zionists back to where they came from because Zionists enjoyed the Hill of Shame.

For Muslims business as usual:

Give me finger- I'll take hand....

of course these are "true" intentions

of Arafatians