Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Do atheists believe that?

ropes in the first century were unsnappable?

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=201110...

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    I agree, the demise of Judis is evidence that the Bible has some imperfections, but that particular imperfection is quite unimportant, so the bulk of the Bible is useful as a guide. Neil

  • 10 years ago

    It is for the common man to reach the hidden thoughts behind the scriptures. The Great Thinkers of the Past (GTPs) wanted the people should be ethical for the stability of the Society. The scriptures were written down in a way, the common man will accept them. But the common man accepted the scriptures, literally. The good intention behind the scriptures was successful without understanding the real meaning.

  • 10 years ago

    I guess the writers of the Bible were kinda dumb then, especially the one who only mentioned the rocks, and not the previous hanging. Was it so hard to write "he hang himself and then the rope snapped and he fell down and spilled his guts on the rocks".

    But nooo, it's one guy writes about the hanging and the other about the rocks. Freakin' iron age journalism.

    Also, one guy writes he threw the 30 silvers down, and the other writes he bought a field with them. And none of them write what OBVIOUSLY happened in the middle, which is, he came back and picked the money up again! I mean, duh!

  • 10 years ago

    When someone hangs himself, the largest pull on the rope is the moment the body falls. The rope would not snap later, unless something is actively affecting it *after*.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.