Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Darwinists: Did you know that...?

Charles Darwin married his "charming, intelligent, and cultured cousin Emma Wedgwood"?

Update:

And for all the "Darwinist" illiterates, here's a formal definition: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Darwinist

18 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    That was pretty darn common in those days.

    I bet some bible characters married their relatives...

  • 10 years ago

    I'm not a Darwinist, but yes. Most people know that Charles Darwin married his cousin. I'm not aware of your motives for asking the question, but just for kicks, here are a few more people who either married or had otherwise intimate relationships with cousins.

    Mary Queen of Scots

    John Adams

    Johann Sebastian Bach

    Albert Einstein

    Rudy Giuliani

    Jerry Lee Lewis

    Thomas Jefferson

    Edgar Allen Poe

    H.G. Wells

    Franklin D. Roosevelt

    Jesse James

  • 10 years ago

    There's no such thing as a "Darwinist".

    And yes, I do know that Charles Darwin married his cousin. This is not an uncommon thing, she wasn't his 1st cousin so genetically speaking, it doesn't matter.

    The taboo about "Cousins" matters if you're 1st cousin or closer because then you have an increased risk of Genetic Disease should the marriage result in offspring. The risks of such disorders is greatly exaggerated... Which is why it has been so common a thing in history.

    Egyptian Royalty.

    Spanish Royalty.

    British Royalty.

    Dutch Royalty.

    So... What is your point, exactly?

    - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -

    ✖ Charles Robert Darwin (12 February 1809 – 19 April 1882)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_darwin

    ✖ Emma Darwin née Wedgwood (2 May 1808 – 7 October 1896)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Darwin

    ✖ Darwin–Wedgwood family

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin-Wedgwood_famil...

    - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -

    The fact that you are just becoming aware of this is really sad.

    P.S. The Human Species is very inter-related. MANY people end up sharing ancestors.

    - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -

    ✖ Bush, Kerry & Hefner: Odd Cousins - CBS News

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/04/politics...

    - - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -

  • 10 years ago

    Yes I did. Lots of people married their cousins in victorian england. BTW whats a darwinist?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 10 years ago

    Yes, I did know that, and I know and Charlie blamed himself for his daughter's death because he married his cousin.

    And his wife was also a devout Christian who loved dog breeding.

    What I don't understand is what your point is. His ideas stand or fall on its own merits no matter how inbred his kids were.

  • 10 years ago

    It is also surmised his ill heath was do to a habit of inbreeding in his family. I accept the theory of evolution, which he was not the first to come up with. . Look up Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829).

  • 10 years ago

    a) There's no such thing as a 'Darwinist.'

    b) I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.

  • 10 years ago

    I'm an Atheist, not a Darwinist.

    Cain and his wife, Abraham and Sara, Nachor and Melcha, Lot and his daughters, Amram and Jochabed, and Amnon and Thamar has incestuous relationships? All in the bible?

    The bible says we all come from Adam and Eve, which means we are all inbred. Yet the bible still condemns incest.

  • 10 years ago

    So what, if the Bible is correct Cain, Abel and Seth married their sisters

  • 10 years ago

    Oh, I see. Well, if he did something we culturally disapprove of, that obviously refutes 150 years of evidence for evolution. I guess the specific god you believe in is responsible, after all.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.