Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

? asked in SportsWrestling · 10 years ago

The Cruelest HHH burial ever!!!?

back in 2007 when he was a face and pedigree'd both paul london and brian kendrick(may be tag team champions that time) 4 no reason,even after they saved HHH from a beatdown.no reason to bury them except to make him look cool to a few peoples 4 a few minutes.

Update:

he could have cheered with this two guys after winning the 6 men tag team match.but no,he had to blow things up!london/kendrik was doing very good as a tag team in 2007.hhh totally disrespect the whole tag team division by pedigree'd them 4 no reason even as a face.

Update 2:

does it hurt triple h's ego to share victory with some younger talents?i will be very pleased if someone like punk,miz,nash kick hhh's ***.

4 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    yes

  • 10 years ago

    You must be a mega Triple H hater.

    To be honest, that's not a burial. That's the way to make Triple H look more dominant. Beating London/Kendrick for a Legendary wrestler caliber of Triple H is just a piece of cake. You can also see The Undertaker can easily squash FBI in just under 2 minutes, he can also squash any Tag Teams. Also, don't you remember Hulk Hogan squash Hassan and Daivari at WM 21? Also Steve Austin with steel chair single handedly beat down Ministry Of Darkness with steel chair during The Undertaker's Black Wedding and single handedly took out Triple H-McMahon Corporation at Backlash 2000?

    It's not only guys that calibers, even guys like Brock Lesnar, Big Show, and even Umaga and The Great Khali also do the same thing. Remember, when Khali destroyed the cruiserweights???

    So, what Triple H does isn't a burial. It's to make him look stronger and more dominant force.

    You should stop being a Triple H hater and look for excuses to diminish him. I was never a Triple H's fan, but I do respect what he has done to WWE and definitely acknowledge him as one of the greatest Legend of all time. In my view, only HBK, The Undertaker, Steve Austin, The Rock, and Bret Hart are better/bigger Legends than Triple H.

    Edit: It never hurt Triple H's ego. He would put over stars, but only the deserving ones. If not, it would be such a waste to be put over by a Legend caliber of Triple H. Look, how Triple H put over Shelton Benjamin few years ago on Raw, also put over Chris Benoit at WM 20, Batista 3 times in 2005, later John Cena at WM 22, Jeff Hardy in 2007, and Randy Orton in 2009, etc. Triple H has been beaten countless times by the deserving and right men. Look how many names have been mentioned. Don't you think that's already more than enough?

    In fact, I do think Triple H even has put over more wrestlers than The Undertaker does and Triple H may have put over wrestlers as much as Shawn Michaels does. Triple H has never had that big of ego, like I said, he would put over deserving wrestlers. He's unlike Hulk Hogan, who won't job no matter what.

    The only thing overrated about Triple H is his 13 World Title reigns. To be a great Legend, you must prove that you don't need too much World Title reigns to be great, just look at Shawn Michaels (4), Steve Austin (6), The Undertaker (7), and Bret Hart (7). They never had that much of reigns, but all of them are considered better than Triple H. So, Triple H can't be considered as great as these Legends because of that, he needs bunch of World Titles to prove his greatness.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    HHH was pretty cruel to Cena in 2006.. constantly burying him on the mic. I believe his trash talking to Cena was what sparked the full blown crowd hatred for him.

    There's probably worse HHH burial, but that's what sticks out in my mind.

  • 10 years ago

    That wasn't a burial, they were still in the same position and viewed the same both before and after that event. It was not a burial.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.