Sachish

Being with Vickie kinda made him less serious threat to everybody.I think its time 4 him to brutally turn on Vickie to make him look more relevant.Vickie would also become face that way.Don't you think so.....!!!

Now-a-days i have to press almost the full volume to listen the audio properly.But a week back it was all fine,in the same videos i can hear the music pretty loudly with just 1/4 of total volume penetration.i just upgraded the version of my VLC media player,that's the only software change made by me in my pc,so what went wrong? Is it me or youtube!!!?Please help me out....

a few months back it was no problem videos always load whether you paused or not.but now videos dont load while paused.my broadband connection always minimized to 512 kbps from 4mbps after every 20 gb usages which is not enough to stream properly.so what should i do to load youtube videos while paused?is their any software or something to fix this?

any paid site would be just fine.

it had the random wwf,wcw episopes and ppvs back to back.i wasn't finished with watching all of this.its my worst nightmare that megavideo is gone.internet is very boring without megavideo as u cant watch old full wrestling shows and randomly without it.so guys do you have any idea when will it back as those double standard feds shut it down.without megavideo life sucks!!!

I have a bsnl ul 1350 broadband plan.there is a single joint in my landline wire.is it blocking my internet connection from more faster bandwidth speed?cause i often get slow speed.

Hello WS,i am a pro wrestling fan and from india.i used to watch old wwe and wcw episodes in a site called flixonline.net.but from last 15 days all of its wrestling episodes are just plain whited out with no streaming link.so right now i am unable to watch old wrestling episodes randomly.but today at the same time the site is saying some wrestling episode to be popular for today which also white out in my pc with no streaming link.how can it be so popular 4 today when its not even streaming?so i am a bit confused right now.i think its kinda just me or my country where almost all media contents of this site are whited out.so wrestling section please erase my confusion by going to that link downstair only once,you just have to tell me whether its white out or streaming completely.there is the link

http://www.flixonline.net/v/tv-shows/wwfwwe-raw/ww...

BQ:please recommend me a site where can i watch old wwe and wcw episodes and ppvs randomly(except youtube,dailymotion)

Most of its streaming links just whited out.

just wondering after such a huge promo week after week on raw he never even said any words.

mines was in 2009 when shane mcmahon single-handedly took out all three legacy members altogether!!?

I think This kind of things only showing that the pg era not gonna end sooner.Its ridiculous!!

I think its kurt angle vs chris benoit in wrestlemania 17,everybody just talk about how rock and austin stole the show,not this match when it was really good.what others think about it and what is urs favourite underrated matches!!?

wouldn't it be awesome?

as a loyal mark u can say the game got it all 13 time world champion,intercontinental champion,european champion,world tag team champion,unified tag team champion,king of the ring,royal rumble winner,grand slam champion.on the otherhand, "the clique,d-generation x,the corporation,mcmahon-helmsley faction,two man power trip,evolution,the dx revival,now the coo" the game had been with each n every dominant stables in wwe.triple h always had been treated with superiority,almost always champion or in the hunt 4 title belt in last 10 years records(1999-2009),heel or face always top of the game whether u like it or not.i think his total achivement is greater than the rock and austin combined if u just read the records manually.rock or austin hardly main-evented 3 or 4 years.triple h main-eventing ppvs almost during the last 10 years.he is already a legend to the marks.if u think everything is real inside the ring,isn't hhh the greatest of alltime!!?

i am talking about hbk vs mr mcmahon match in wrestlemania 22.it won the pwi 'match of the year' 2006.the match was great as comparing vince not even a wrestler,still no reason to name it moty.there were other matches which could be named into moty,

imo,it should be angle vs taker at no way out(2006),edge vs cena tlc match at unforgiven also was very good.what others think about it!

he is too boring on mic and slow in ring ability,still 9 time world champion at the age of 31,when peoples like john morrison never held one at the same time.still as a heel he was sometimes ok,but as a face he completely sucks.

back in 2007 when he was a face and pedigree'd both paul london and brian kendrick(may be tag team champions that time) 4 no reason,even after they saved HHH from a beatdown.no reason to bury them except to make him look cool to a few peoples 4 a few minutes.

now let me get this straight hbk had participated in 12 wrestlemania matches since 1992(before wrestlemania 25).all the matches so incredible clearly stole the show.but hbk only managed to win only 5 matches.out of these 5, two came from wm 22 and wm 24 against non wrestler mr mcmahon and 60 years old semiretired ric flair.his victory against bret hart in wm 12 came at overtime in an iron man match,not so credible to marks.he almost lost all matches in their 3 year long feud with triple h.he did't even get some decent title run before the feuding with taker.on the countray we saw he had been fighting in 'all or nothing' matches with jbl to save his legacy from being handed over to billionaire jbl,so vulnerable storyline position!! by the way wrestling is scripted but after seeing this all why should a typical mark take hbk such a serious threat to takers legacy?dont u think the character of hbk should had been given much potentials to make the feud look more interestling,undertaker also shold have won the eec match at no way out(2009) instead of hhh.by losing to hhh cleanly at the previous ppv taker also lose some credibility.next year(wrestlemania 26) hbk-taker feud storyline imo was one of stupidest and dumbest of alltime.why should michaels need to beat the streak when he almost quit wrestling to be a cook!! hbk even tapped out to rookie cody rhodes at a late 2009 ppv,so weak himself by storyline!how, can he beat the taker from this?hhh,batista,orton,edge and others were always portrayed with strong characteristics before facing taker at wrestlemania in their respective feuds.but hbk-taker wrestlemania storylines was so lame!!!but when the match starts u can forget everything elso as they are so good in the ring.so the bottomline is great matches and pointless storylines.

now everyone must agree with the fact that hbk is one of the greatest performer(probably the greatest) of alltime in wrestling industry.when michaels returns in 2002 hhh turned on hbk and they started feuding each other.there had been a unsanctioned street fight,3 stages of hell,last man standing ,hell in a cell and other standart wrestling matches throughout these three years on ppvs and monday night raw episodes.hbk pinned hhh in their unsanctioned street fight with a rollup,although hhh dominated throughout the match and attacked hbk with a sledgehammer after the match,so technically its just a pinfall for hbk,not a clear victory,cause hhh looked stronger after the match.after that in 3 years they fought each others numerous times,but none of these matches were alloted to hbk.hhh swept clearly in 3 stages of hell matches at armageddon(2002) and hell in a cell match at bad blood(2004).hhh won it anyway at taboo tuesday(2004) too.their royal rumble(2004) match ended in a double count out.hbk never got a single legitimate victory over hhh in any of raw episodes also.wwe prolonged the rivalry from 2002-2004,but never let hbk shine.and what about hhh!!! why did he refuse to job clearly to the greatest performer of alltime and his buddy hbk for a single time.wasn't it sarcastic?hhh turned on hbk at 2002,they started the feud,hhh almost beated hbk in every singles matches,looked hbk weak and thus triumphed over the hbk.now dont get me wrong i know there are many hhh fan out there.and i am not a die hard hhh-hater or a hbk fan.actually back in 2000 i enjoyed hhh matches very much.but now with no defiance i can say that hhh did every possible thing in the world to bury hbk.a single loss does not get you buried.but isn't constantly losing to the same guy in several manner on different occation called 'burying'.but the problem is its not rvd or booker t,its 'mr wrestlemania' hbk shawn michaels.at least mr wrestlemania cann't be buried.share your opinions please.i am thristy for answers.(dont count the survivor series 2002 eec match,it was a six-pack challance,still hhh looked strong in the match)