Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What's more confusing to you ~> the word atheism or the fact that if you take the space away from atheism. . .?

you have a theism? Really, how close is atheism to a theism?

Yes, I know immaterial and I'm material are two different things. One's spirit and one's substance. But if you see the two as one, do you have the total package or nothing at all?

Update:

I know the commutative property where A+B=B+A; therefore, no matter which way you manipulate a word or words, the equation is still balanced if you have the same letters present on both sides. You professors have forgotten your most basic of math skills haven't you?

Update 2:

I'm not talking about adding or subtracting any letters here, just the space, which is nothing in essence. Nothing plus nothing is still nothing. Add nothing in, around, or to a letter and the letter still retains its original value.

Update 3:

So the fact that 'Princess Diana' commutatively is 'Ascend in Paris' and 'End is a car spin' (among others) has nothing to do with anything? I mean she died in a wreck in Paris, did she not? 'World Trade Center' is 'lewd terror act end' by this same formula. This is no coincidence. This is math at its purest form.

So yes, this is a deep question, much deeper than you thought.

Update 4:

Professor, this is not a conspiracy theory. It's math. You scorn me for no reason. Good for you!

Update 5:

Whoa Stevie! Thanks for opening up! You have made some valid points. But if dog bites man, it's only a matter of time before man bites dog. Ultimately, we know this: A binary operation shows us that one term operating on a second is equal to the second operating on the first; therefore, the beginning of this particular equation would be 'Princess Diana' and the end result is 'End is a car spin,' among other things. The point is they are commutative and undoubtedly a part of the same equation.

On a lesser note, we know 'the Nascar Team' are 'names that race,' 'the American actor Alfredo Pacino' is 'an ideal or top character of cinema,' and you are 'dishonest' when you 'do the sins.' How do we know this? In reality, it is because they are defined this way. What came first? 'Names that race' or 'the Nascar Team'? 'An ideal or top character of cinema' or 'the American actor Alfredo Pacino'? Does one 'do the sins' or is one 'dishonest'? It is my belief they all occur at once an

Update 6:

. . .d separately. Clearly, there were names that raced before the Nascar team was ever assimilated. There were and are ideal or top characters of cinema other than Al Pacino. And one must do the sin before they are labeled as dishonest. Yet all of these describe in detail events and outcomes, a before and an after if you will. However, all occur within the same spectrum and at the same time.

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    That would be taking the letter A away not a space...there are no spaces in atheism.

    So what's it mean that God spelled backwards is dog?

    Should I worship backwards dogs??

  • 10 years ago

    Um ... wouldn't transforming "atheism" to "a theism" involve inserting a space, not taking one away?

    Oh, and notice what happens when you insert a space into "space":

    spa ce

    Cool, huh?

    ____

    EDIT: Oh my goodness, you're for real.

    You said: "I know the commutative property where A+B=B+A"

    Language is not mathematics.

    If there were a commutative property of sentence construction then "Dog bites man" and "Man bites dog" would mean the same thing. Most of us interpret the sentences differently.

    If there were a commutative property of spelling, then "Man kills dog" and "Man kills god" would mean the same thing. Most of us interpret the sentences differently.

    For what it's worth, even in mathematics the commutative property does not hold for most structures.

    You said: "So the fact that 'Princess Diana' commutatively is 'Ascend in Paris' and 'End is a car spin' (among others) has nothing to do with anything?"

    So what do you make of the fact that 'Princess Diana' commutatively is also:

    Niacin spreads

    Spaced air inns

    Canapes rid sin

    or

    Dance rain piss

    Yeah, that's deep all right.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    I used to eat beef a lot then i realized that if you take the f away you get bee

    the commutative property is a required axiom to define an algebraic feild of numbers. Its has no meaning with words.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    10 years ago

    You think you're being deep but really you're misunderstanding etymology.

    edit: You are also misunderstanding math.

    edit #2: No, it's still not deep. Using idiot conspiracy theories to justify an inability to comprehend simple etymology and algebra just makes you look like an eleven year old who thinks he's smarter than everyone else.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    Word play=A+

    Philosophy = C at best

    Theism means "belief in god"

    Monotheism means "belief in one god"

    Polytheism means "belief in multiple gods"

    Atheism means "without belief in god.

    Both theism and Atheism are still religions, but there is a huge gap between the two. Which would you rather have; sexual intercourse or asexual intercourse?

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    Dude, pass the spliff and shut up.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    a means not for example atypical means not typical.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    So, you don't know what etymology is, huh?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.