doctrinal vs historical christology?

Well, Babygirl:

Doctrinal is fraught with tenants of tradition and historical christology during the Dark Ages does not match first-century manuscripts.

The Reformation brought out some truths, and the Catholic Church struggled for 18 years during the Council of Trent to accept Protestant's SOLA SCRIPTURA, or church tradition.

This interesting document shows the RCC accepted tradition because Protestants actually follow the teachings of the Church.

Read this interesting document written over 100 years ago: http://revelado.org/romeschallenge.htm

Blessings, Messiah

The physical beilding was a good move to allow shelter. yet some apsects of costs created challeges to affording it, sidetracking evangelical motives and expectations.

The holys pirit, obedience to God and Vhrist here are to help others to receive Christ as savior.

Growth is dependant upon prayers, evangelism verbally, deeds, the gospel and bible teachings to buildup the saints. disciple them for growth.

I cannot accuratly give historical in depth knowledge of this in some ways.

The early church obetyed and left jerusalem, united with Jews for a time.

They shared, cared and Jesus Christ was with them powerfully in growth.

Persecutions, lion sports, hatreds, poverty were all issues too.

Somehow the sharing overcame all the money worries as some were welathy to give.

The printed bible coming far later gave churches more clout and knowledge.

They had less printed materials availble as it was all hand written if at all.

Clergy was responsible for them in ways.

Poor people were not always welcomed and the street became a source and plave of gatherings to evangelize.

You would need a good library or clergy or sites on u tub or the web to assist you like wikipedia.

It all seemd a holy Roman believrs, tribes thing under the Habsburg areas in Europe.

Tribes fought and challenged one another.

The NT writers took, (historical?), events and, (deduced, drew out, extrapolated, explained?), doctrines from them.

doctrinal is good

historical is not inspired