Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Which scenario is better: abortion is illegal but common or abortion is legal and uncommon?

Just for a second, let's all step outside of our own moral and religious codes, political leanings and gender prejudices. For a moment, pretend you don't care about any of these things and answer this question:

Is it wrong to kill a baby?

Hear me out. I'm not trying to imply anything about whether a fetus is a baby. But we can all agree that nobody wants to see babies die or be murdered, yes?

So why is it that when it comes to the abortion question it has to be only about whether abortion should be legal or not? Why do we not ask ourselves: Why are women having abortions and what can we do to lower the likelihood that a woman will have an abortion? If we care about our society, then we should know that caring about babies and women means more than simply making a law about abortion.

Would you want to live in a world where abortion is always legal and always safe, but rarely ever the outcome of a pregnancy? Or would you rather live in a world where abortion is illegal but still happens frequently and women end up losing their lives over it?

Update:

Is it that hard to step out of your own box and answer the question? Instead of passing judgement on others (apparently making a baby and having an abortion only happens to stupid, unwed, immoral women) why don't we think about the causes of abortion and try to eliminate those? In countries where the gender parity is high, sex ed is mandatory and abortion is legal, the abortion rate is lower.

Update 2:

@bored: Re: "Not to mention your repulsive comment about women who have sex before marriage being 'immoral'." I hope you are not referring to my comment in "Additional Details," as that is not, in any way, my opinion about unmarried women who have sex. I was making a reference to Quizzard's answer, but I guess that was not clear. So, that's my fault if you misunderstood me.

Also, I am not at all advocating abstinence-only education, but rather, quite the opposite. I'm not sure that is clear. I just didn't want to provide my own point of view because I am interested in what people think about a question like this (mainly what "pro-lifers" think about it, since on that said, it is always about the "baby").

And yes, abortions will happen, legal or illegal. That is actually my point. I'm not suggesting we try to prevent abortions completely. But if we works towards certain goals, abortion rates will go down naturally. The US is generally ranked lowest among developed nations on issues r

6 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 6
    10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Most of the debate about abortion (outside of what the religious nuts do, which I don't really consider "debate" anyways) is regarding issues of access to pregnancy. At what stage in the pregnancy should we provide easy access to abortion, and for what reasons?

    After all, a zygote is much different than a third trimester fetus.

    The problem is that you'll get a lot of us on the pro-choice side, who will say that aborting early enough in the pregnancy (before the 3rd trimester is a common line) is not morally reprehensible at all. Aborting becomes more reprehensible as the pregnancy continues to later trimesters, and the fetus picks up some cognitive functions.

    Since we have already decided through the courts (agree or not, it's irrelevant) that the woman's right to bodily security trumps any rights of the fetus (if any), the focus needs to shift to access.

    Not to mention your repulsive comment about women who have sex before marriage being "immoral".

    Not to mention that you seem to be very poorly educated on the topic. Sure, the first category of women who abort are those in their teens, but the second is women in their mid-late thirties.

    If you want to stop abortion, why not think about teaching safe sex practices, instead of this "abstinence-only" garbage?

  • ?
    Lv 7
    10 years ago

    Yes, it's wrong to kill a baby. However, it's not wrong to abort a fetus that is inviable and lacks sentience. It is therefore not wrong to allow women the right to choose whether they want this inviable, insentient organism feeding off of their nutrients and growing inside of their bodies or not.

    And you're right about sex education being totally upside down in this country. It's a demonstrable FACT that the states with the highest incidence of "absitenence only" education also magically have the highest rates of STDs, abortions and teen pregnancy.

  • I'd prefer to live in a world where women took responsibility for their own actions and where abortion was treated with the disdain that it deserves. A world where unwed mothers (and fathers, let's be fair) were not a chance to cheer, but a source of shame. A world where the children of unwed parents are put up for adoption by the millions of stable couples capable of raising a child properly, rather than perpetuating the cycle of unwed parents-poor child-unwed parent in their own right.

  • Anonymous
    10 years ago

    The only way to prevent abortions is to prevent pregnancy in the first place. Legal or illegal, they will happen.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 10 years ago

    I'm going to go with option C.

    If you don't want kids.. it's really not that hard to prevent pregnancy. Abortion exits because people are freaking morons.

  • 10 years ago

    Of course make it legal.

    Source(s): Yay! I'm an unwed mother. I am shamed. I am worthless. I should have given my son up for adoption. I think I'm gonna go apply for that welfare stuff now. Perpetuate the dream.
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.