Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Use the definition of exp(x) to derive Euler's Formula?

Please note that in Real Analysis, exp(x)=sum([x^k]/k!, k=0, k=infinity) is its definition.

Update:

No. The fundamental property of the exponential is dy/dx=y. That is how the power series is derived. The limit you gave is derived from the power series definition.

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    No... e^x is not defined by a summation notation. This is how e is defined,

    e = lim_{n→∞} (1+1/n)^n

    This is the fundamental definition of e. First appearance in history. All other properties are ultimately derived from this limit.

    ===

    No, the limit I gave is the original definition. This is how Jacob Bernoulli defined it when he discovered it back in the 1670's.

    How many unique definitions do you think one thing can have in mathematics? Just one! Everything else is a subsequently derived property.

    The power series is derived from the fact that dy/dx = y, but that is just one more property. The series expansion is a property, the derivative is a property, so on. The limit is the definition.

    Modern mathematicians and teachers use the word "definition" a little too liberally nowadays, when they really mean its an "identity" (requiring a proof).

  • 9 years ago

    This is much too long to do in Yahoo! Answers especially without formal math notation but the proofs on Wikipedia are pretty bullet proof.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_formula#Pro...

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    yeah, iceman is right, some things are just too tedious to do on yahoo answers.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.