Are the mainstream media scared that Ron Paul will beat Obama?

There is always a pattern to ABC and MSNBC. You know when someone is becoming popular over the established Democrat (as in 2010 congress election) because these two media entities begin negative spin coverage of who ever that person is.

The media helps the status quo, in which political particular pastimes are maintained. Ron Paul caters to no particular pastimes, in basic terms man or woman liberties as defined by technique of the U.S. structure. If Ron Paul were elected president, he might want to commence to dismantle the present political device, giving plenty decrease back to us all as persons, yet disempowering those who've relied on the present equipment. no one likes to surrender skill - so the media treats him like a leper. I accept as true with you - the media's reaction to him is really a reason to take a nearer look at him. I propose going to Ron Paul's internet website - you would not disagree with him on as many themes as you imagine.

No.

The only people who believe that are people who want to blame the media for being either the pawns or puppets. It is the standard thing that the politicians who people so hate always say is the cause of their problems, and that the "media" got it wrong with their "gotcha" reporting. However, when people like Paul are given the opportunity to set the record straight what do they do, they walk out of interviews instead of answering questions about what they have done. The rhetoric sounds great (to those who want to hear it), but it is a tired and old red herring that is starting to smell IMO.

Let's see how Paul does in the South Carolina and Florida primaries before making a judgement on how effective his campaign is so far.

No one is scared of anything. Paul could never beat Obama.

No! Ron Paul couldn't beat his way out of a paper bag!