Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Society & CultureReligion & Spirituality · 9 years ago

Christians and others of R&S: With which of these social/political views held by Pat Buchanan would you concur?

1. On race relations in the late 1940s and early 1950s: "There were no politics to polarize us then, to magnify every slight. The 'negroes' of Washington had their public schools, restaurants, bars, movie houses, playgrounds and churches; and we had ours." (Right from the Beginning, Buchanan's 1988 autobiography, p. 131)

2. White House adviser Buchanan urged President Nixon in an April 1969 memo not to visit "the Widow King" on the first anniversary of Martin Luther King's assassination, warning that a visit would "outrage many, many people who believe Dr. King was a fraud and a demagogue and perhaps worse.... Others consider him the Devil incarnate. Dr. King is one of the most divisive men in contemporary history." (New York Daily News, 10/1/90)

3. In another memo from Buchanan to Nixon: "There is a legitimate grievance in my view of white working-class people that every time, on every issue, that the black militants loud-mouth it, we come up with more money.... If we can give 50 Phantoms [jet fighters] to the Jews, and a multi-billion dollar welfare program for the blacks...why not help the Catholics save their collapsing school system." (Boston Globe, 1/4/92)

4. Trying to justify apartheid in South Africa, he denounced the notion that "white rule of a black majority is inherently wrong. Where did we get that idea? The Founding Fathers did not believe this." (syndicated column, 2/7/90) He referred admiringly to the apartheid regime as the "Boer Republic": "Why are Americans collaborating in a U.N. conspiracy to ruin her with sanctions?" (syndicated column, 9/17/89)

5. On gays: "Homosexuality involves sexual acts most men consider not only immoral, but filthy. The reason public men rarely say aloud what most say privately is they are fearful of being branded 'bigots' by an intolerant liberal orthodoxy that holds, against all evidence and experience, that homosexuality is a normal, healthy lifestyle." (syndicated column, 9/3/89)

6. On AIDS, Buchanan wrote in 1983: "The poor homosexuals -- they have declared war upon nature, and now nature is extracting an awful retribution (AIDS)." (Los Angeles Times, 11/28/86) Later that year, he demanded that New York City Ed Koch and New York Gov. Mario Cuomo cancel the Gay Pride Parade or else "be held personally responsible for the spread of the AIDS plague." "With 80,000 dead of AIDS, our promiscuous homosexuals appear literally hell-bent on Satanism and suicide," Buchanan wrote in 1990 (syndicated column, 10/17/90). In the 1992 campaign, he declared: "AIDS is nature's retribution for violating the laws of nature." (Seattle Times, 7/31/93)

7. On women's rights: "Rail as they will about 'discrimination,' women are simply not endowed by nature with the same measures of single-minded ambition and the will to succeed in the fiercely competitive world of Western capitalism." (syndicated column, 11/22/83)

8. On Democracy: In a January, 1991 column, Buchanan suggested that "quasi-dictatorial rule" might be the solution to the problems of big municipalities and the federal fiscal crisis: "If the people are corrupt, the more democracy, the worse the government." (Washington Times, 1/9/91) He has written disparagingly of the "one man, one vote Earl Warren system."

8a: . In Right from the Beginning, Buchanan refers to Spanish dictator Francisco Franco as a "Catholic savior." He called Franco, along with Chile's Gen. Pinochet, "soldier-patriots." (syndicated column 9/17/89) Both men overthrew democracy in their countries.

9. Buchanan devotes a chapter of his autobiography -- "As We Remember Joe" -- to defending Senator Joe McCarthy. He advocated that Nixon "burn the tapes" during Watergate, and he criticized Reagan for failing to pardon Oliver North over Iran-Contra.

10. On Theocracy as a system of Govt for the US: Attacking what he considers the "democratist temptation, the worship of democracy as a form of governance," Buchanan commented: "Like all idolatries, democratism substitutes a false god for the real, a love of process for a love of country." (Patrick J. Buchanan: From the Right, newsletter, Spring/90)

14 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    1. Obviously, he's conveniently ignoring the discrimination against blacks in the quality of the facilities and institutions they were provided. Although I do think this many of these modern-day accusations of racism have definitely gotten out of hand, and are reverse-discriminatory, e.g. white people routinely being fired for using the word "nlgger," whereas blacks can use racial slurs with impunity. Not to mention a detriment to true free speech.

    2. Divisive, yes. A bad person, no. I particularly like his recommendation to judge people not by superficial means, but by the content of their character.

    3. I think people who send their kids to religious schools should be given vouchers for every subject except religion, which would reduce their tuition costs approximately 90%. That said, I strongly oppose the oppressive ways students are treated in Catholic schools. Fortunately, they're collapsing in America.

    4. People should be given equal rights regardless of race.

    5. I feel people should be free to express their opinion on homosexuality one way or the other, without fear of legal prosecution or loss of employment. That's what true free speech is all about, right? It's for all, not just those who don't need to work for a living.

    6. I have trouble finding any secular reason to ban homosexuality.

    7. Women in America make up 51% of the population, and control 70% of America's total monetary net worth.

    8. It is the government whose power must be limited most, as those in power can commit the worst crimes. A tyrannical dictator can murder MILLIONS of times more people than your average serial-killer.

    9. Kinda laughable to see ol' Pat going at it with Ronnie. They always seemed to hold many of the same views.

    10. Theocratic government, seriously, Pat? Just look at the nations of the Middle East.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Number 8

  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    If Pat Robertson is a man of God then I am the messiah. HOw can one possibly be a Christian and hold such views and do so publicly?

    Brightest Blessings,

    Raji the Green Witch

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    I'm would'nt concur with any of them. I have liked his stands on strongly controlling the border which got him labeled an isolationist back then even though everyone wants border control now. I also liked his stand on having fair trade laws and not just free trade. That also got him labeled with names even though everyone wants to know why all our jobs were sent over seas and talks about the unfair trade between China and us.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Sigh. Great entertainment. So I went to registrar of voters and told them I wanted to register as a Republican. They said I had to trade my brain for a box of crayons

  • 9 years ago

    The only thing I would agree with Pat Buchanan on is his supposed post-empire conception of U.S. international military policy.

    However, he has reversed course on his "non-interventionism" on occasion. He could be lying about that now, too.

  • 9 years ago

    I've got to say none.

    PS: I am somewhat in favour of substituting due process & democracy for god...but not loving his spin on the idea.

  • !?!
    Lv 6
    9 years ago

    None of the above...I try not to think like an idiot. I fail sometimes but not that badly.

    Source(s): Pax.
  • He's an idiot. End of story.

    I respect that he doesn't toe the party line and I respect his idea to put forth his views.

    But his views have nothing in them for me and I don't think his ideas are useful to America either practically or philisophically. At worst, he's a racist that is afraid to label himself a racist and he's an authoritarian that tries to advocate authoritarianism through twisting facts.

    ...and why is Y/A telling me I misspelled 'philisophically'?

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    I agree with every one of those except for #10.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.