Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

? asked in SportsWrestling · 9 years ago

Who was better, Shawn Michaels or Bret Hart?

Obviously one of the greatest rivalries in WWE/WWF history, but who was better?

BQ: Which time period was better, The 1990' or 2000- present day?

12 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    HBK was the better performer.

    Bret Hart was the better wrestler.

    BQ The 90s up untill 2005-2006.The 90s was better imo.

  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    the hitman had extra call runs (thus far) with 5 wwf heavyweight titles and a couple of wcw championships, and had extra significant activities at wrestlemania. Michaels has 4 heavyweight call runs(i think) and a pair wrestlemania significant activities. Hart replaced into the 2d wrestler ever to finish the triple crown(tag, intercontinental, and international)michaels finished this as well. They both had sturdy tag careers id say their almost equivalent in that branch. each wrestler replaced into the numerous appeal for WWE at one think about their occupation, harts run on the suitable replaced right into slightly longer besides the undeniable fact that. head to head they placed some large matches on yet michaels were given the finest snigger. Michaels is a extra appropriate badguy and hart is a extra appropriate goodguy. Their both very sturdy and that's a not consumer-friendly question yet i imagine the hitman edges shawn michaels via a hair.

  • 9 years ago

    Shawn Michaels for sure! also he had a longer career and overall a much better person and wrestler.

    BQ: 1990 to 2002 was the best days of WWF! since the name change, WWE has not been as good since, it went downhill. WWE needs to come away from PG! The best things that's happened through the 2000's is excellent talent, but they are limited to what they are really capable of doing in the ring. poor talent is all down to one man, Vince Mcmahon!

  • Joey
    Lv 5
    9 years ago

    HBK was better than Hitman

    BQ:2000

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • can't beleivenobody has said the hitman yet. he was a far better wrestler and a far better performer. without a hitman there wouldn't have been a shawn michaels. or they may well have been but he wouldn't be on the pedestal he is today. both are great wrestlers but the hitman's excellence reigns supreme

    Source(s): WWF
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    The Show Stopper, The Headliner, The Main Event > The Best There Is, The Best There Was And The Best There Ever Will Be..!

  • 7 years ago

    HBK because he had a longer career and overall a he is the best wrestler in wwe/wwf

  • Slay
    Lv 6
    9 years ago

    The Heart Baked kid aha you would know what i mean if you seen the video on youtube but HBK.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Rock vs Austin was way better. I can only remember two HBK vs HItman matches (In Your House & Survivor Series).

    ______

    HBK wins for me.

  • 9 years ago

    They're Obviously both better than you

    Source(s): nWo
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.