Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What does the fifth Amendment to the Constitution mean?

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence [sic] to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

Attorney General Eric Holder today provided the most detailed terms to date on the legal principals behind the U.S. drone campaign and the U.S. government's legal authority to target and kill U.S. citizens...

"Some have called such operations 'assassinations.' They are not, and the use of that loaded term is misplaced. Assassinations are unlawful killings," Holder continued in his prepared remarks. "The U.S. government's use of lethal force in self defense against a leader of al Qaeda or an associated force who presents an imminent threat of violent attack would not be unlawful -- and therefore would not violate the Executive Order banning assassination or criminal statutes."

"Because the United States is in an armed conflict, we are authorized to take action against enemy belligerents under international law," Holder said today. "The Constitution empowers the President to protect the nation from any imminent threat of violent attack. And international law recognizes the inherent right of national self-defense. None of this is changed by the fact that we are not in a conventional war."

http://news.yahoo.com/holder-speak-targeted-killin...

I thought it meant that the government could not do this for any reason, with the exception being military personel in time of war, which we are not and haven't been since world war II, or it would be acting outside of the laws of our government... Silly me...

2 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    It is quite apparent that Holder is certain he is smarter than the Constitution and all of those who wrote it and those who, for over 200 years, have upheld the principles of the American Constitution.

    I guess that places him in violation of his Oath of Office and makes him a Traitor.

    Whereas war situations place the military into situations where the convening of a Grand Jury is likely impractical, a Military Court using the Uniform Code of Military Justice becomes the only practical solution to situations that are not possible to remedy within the framework of normal Constitutional methods.

    Since the Obama Administration has granted Trials to Terrorists who are Not Citizens, but War Criminals, I find Holders statement to be absurd, contradictory and Despotic.

  • 9 years ago

    "due process of law" now means its ok if Holder said so

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.