Anyone who is concerned about America check out this question...?

Reworded from a previous question I asked...

The power to repeal laws was given to no branch of the government in the Constitution. Judicial power was given to the supreme courts and the other various courts. But the power to repeal laws is a right reserved to the people according to the tenth Amendment.

So why don't we just create a website where registered voters can get on and repeal laws that the government creates which we do not wish imposed upon us? We make it easier to get a law repealed than it is to get a law created, since it is a direct vote.

We can use the Secretary of State voter registry as verification of account holders rather then the "click this link in your email" verification that businesses use to ensure that it's a one vote per person system. As well as when a law has reached the required amount of votes for repeal (a number that would be voted upon) the electronic signatures would be reverified by the SOS registry.

No vote on a particular law would count as a no, so it wouldn't run like a general election where it is a majority of those who choose to vote.

The way a law would come up for a vote is someone submits it, 15,000 electronic signatures would allow it to be ready for a vote. One law is voted on at a time.

The way it stands right now, the only way to get a law repealed is if a person gets charged with a crime challenges it in court. Then it is left up to the discretion of 9 people (picked by the government, not the people) whether or not the millions of people in the US continue to be subject to this law. Also this group of 9 cherry picks which cases it "cares" to hear about, and only hears 75-150 cases per year. Last year there were over 8000 pleas to hear cases by the US supreme court.

As it is said, what is not illegal, must therefore be legal. If the government ever got the bright idea to make this action illegal, which would be proof that the government is not on the side of the people. We Amend the Constitution to constrict them from doing this.

Does this sound like a good idea?

And

What issues are foreseen that I have not addressed, so that I may further fine tune this idea?