Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Do you want to hear a good response to that whole, "If you don't vote, you can't complain" phrase?

Here it is:

When the only choices I have to vote for are pieces of ****, and the media only cares to argue back and forth. And the voters themselves have no idea why they are choosing to vote for a piece of **** except that the others smell worse, then I don't find the need to choose. I think I reserve the right to complain when the only choices we have are stank.

Update:

I'm quite liberal too boss man. A coward's way out, huh? Like the person I write in has a fighting chance in hell to actually be selected. Don't be ridiculous. The fact of the matter is that we will have a 2-party system forever and ever after this if Ron Paul doesn't win in some form (as this is the last time he will run).

I'm not saying I don't vote for community wide acts though. However I will say this, is it not cowardly (as you say) to not put down a vote for President?

It's not that Obama doesn't have the best intentions for the majority of Americans--as I believe he tries.

But in our non-transparent government, nobody will truly be able to "fix" things anymore. It's not a sign of pessimism, it is fact. The general public no longer believes in "good intentions" of the other guys. And nobody believes that a third party candidate can win so few will vote for that person mainly because they have no chance in hell of

Update 2:

Edit:

Nope I'm not a Ron Paul supporter. It's not that he should win because he has the best policies---I don't think he does. He has to win though because this is the last time a third party candidate will ever have a chance. Plain an simple, NO ONE will ever rise up as a third party candidate with as much support as this guy.

To be frank: I'm liberal--as such I support Obama more than anyone else. However, there's so much bickering. Face it, the Republicans have been blowing it since Nixon (including Reagan--he just almost got away with it). And they ***** about Democrats who have actually had a pretty good track record of TRYING to do what is best for the country to get it going forward.

I don't feel the need to vote though because the one issue that won't be handled: The clusterfuck that is the government system now. Politicians can't pass legislature that really matters because there will always be the other guys sitting on their overpric

Update 3:

Politicians can't pass legislature that really matters because there will always be the other guys sitting on their overpriced hands. Look at the solution to EDUCATION: there isn't one. Look at the solution to GREEN ENERGY: there won't be one so long as oil is in the ground.

Again I think the President tries (Democrats more so than Republicans). But, there is no point who is in office because of something like the ratchet effect in economics: Republicans crank the screw ups higher, democrats (failingly) try to undo some effects. Then when a Republican gets back in, they screw it up more.

And all we have is a media who won't protest because they are busy being partisan. And of course the voters like us will not protest because as soon as we say something, some DICK on here will say "I suppose you are a Ron Paul supporter" or "You are a commi" or "Ugh, you are a Republican". Everything is so partisan--and typically bi-partisan at th

Update 4:

And all we have is a media who won't protest because they are busy being partisan. And of course the voters like us will not protest because as soon as we say something, some DICK on here will say "I suppose you are a Ron Paul supporter" or "You are a commi" or "Ugh, you are a Republican". Everything is so partisan--and typically bi-partisan at that. So instead, I the consumer would just choose to be apathetic about knowing that the country is going to go to **** in time, and why not in my generation instead of my kid's? At least then we might have time to fix after it becomes protest-worthy.

10 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    It's your choice.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Yeah, that certainly is the coward's way out. Why not a write in candidate? Do you know you dont just vote for president during an election? Apparently not. It doesnt take pages just to pick a president you know. And heres teh thing: you can go vote WITHOUT choosing a presidential candidate to vote for. Just don't fill in the "party line" option and actually read the entire ballot. I do. Ive been doing that since i was 18, the first year i voted.

    If you wanna whine about the presidency, fine. But why are you depriving your local community of the things voted for at the same time as the presidency? I mean, its up to you of course. It just seems wholly irresponsible and kinda mean if you think about it.

    Source(s): Democrat here. Yes I'm giving you tips here for voting, despite knowing that you will vote against the things I want. Why? Because I just can't stand to see people suffer.
  • 9 years ago

    It is still your choice, whether to use your democratic (and long fought for) right and vote for a party. You can still vote informal too ... Your choice, and an easy cop out then, to say ... " well I didn't vote them in" ... Like the majority seem to after every election.....

    If you don't like your choices you can always put yourself up for others - perhaps you would be more popular than the parties already doing so.

  • cisco
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    between the main undemanding motives for the word's commencing place is that the expression dates from the 2nd international conflict, the place "9 yards" replace into the size of an airplane device-gun ammunition belt, and to "bypass the comprehensive 9 yards" replace into to apply it up fullyyt. although, device-gun ammunition belts weren't 9 yards long, and the expression has been reliably dated returned basically to early 1964, in U.S. area software slang.[a million] It replace into additionally curiously huge-unfold between Air tension workers in Vietnam.[2] with the aid of November 1967 it replace into recorded in use interior the U.S. military, likewise from Vietnam, and for the period of mid-1969 replace into appearing in newspaper classified ads interior the united states.[3] the 1st quotation interior the Oxford English Dictionary is from 1970, interior the magazine observe staring at.[4] at an analogous time as no written occurrences have been got here across predating 1964, various anecdotal memories recommend the word dates returned a minimum of a extra decade, probably into the Nineteen Forties. between the greater advantageous-documented situations is provided with the aid of Captain Richard Stratton, who recorded in 2005 that he encountered the word for the period of naval flight guidance in Florida in July 1955 as area of a ribald tale some mythical Scotsman.[5] it somewhat is been suggested that there is powerful circumstantial information it replace into not greater often than not use in 1961, as Ralph Boston set a international checklist for the long leap that 3 hundred and sixty 5 days at 27 feet, or 9 yards, yet no information record has been got here across that made any connection with the term, suggesting that newshounds have been unaware of it or did not regard it as undemanding adequate to apply as a pun.[6] of course, huge-unfold etymology has risen to the undertaking; a huge style of motives have been placed forward to describe the purported origins of the term. suggested sources have been as different using fact the quantity of graves or concrete mixers; the size of bridal veils, kilts, burial shrouds, bolts of fabric, or saris; American soccer; ritual disembowelment; and the form of particular crusing vessels. Little documentary information has ever surfaced helping any of those, and an excellent style of labour below the significant draw back of being a number of centuries in the past than the 1st recorded use of the term.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 9 years ago

    Let me guess, you are a Ron Paul supporter.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    You can vote for anyone you want. They don't even need to be on the ballot.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    I've actually been told that, as well... My response to that, has always been.. Listen closely, as I complain...

  • 9 years ago

    use the old, "Who should I have voted for? (Opposite candidate name here).

  • 9 years ago

    Your response clearly indicates how ignorant you really are.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    ok

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.