I've read answers tonight, saying that Stalin was a right winger, are cons also the reason libs kids are ugly?

Question

I say that in jest, but seriously, is there anything bad that liberals aren't willing to try and blame on the right?

Mao was an avowed leftist and left millions dead in his wake, Stalin was an avowed leftist, having learned at the feet of Trotsky, Marx and Lenin and millions died under the implementation of his plans and purges; Pol Pot, yet another avowed leftist that killed millions... All the same, if you share the same leftist views as the aforementioned, own it, don't try to reassign these murderous left wing loons to the right.

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." - John Adams

Paul Grass™ · Accepted Answer

I guess we are the reason for every thing a liberal wants to put the blame on, the truth must be offensive to those that purport communism or any form of socialism to be right wing, as nothing could be farther from the truth

? · Answer

And Hitler was a Fascist (right winger), as were Kim Il-Sung, Kim Jong-Il, and Kim Jong-Un, despite all of them calling themselves socialists or democractic socialists (I don't think anyone will confuse North Korea with a Republican Democracy despite what they call themselves). Doesn't mean most conservatives are like them

I also hasten to point out the difference between communist socialism and democratic socialism. communist socialism is like Russia. Democratic Socialism is like England, Japan, Australia, Canada, Sweden, Germany, etc etc etc

Dave87gn · Answer

You don't understand political science..people are not defined by what they call themselves...dictatorships are on the right of the political scale...thats a fact

? · Answer

No that would be Progressives.

Trending News

I've read answers tonight, saying that Stalin was a right winger, are cons also the reason libs kids are ugly?

4 Answers