Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Garth
Lv 6
Garth asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 9 years ago

How is this not unconstitutional?

http://www.aurorasentinel.com/news/chief-defends-d... Seriously, there are more important things than catching a thief.

Update:

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/06/poli... is this more credible?

If it was a murderer, I'd still say there are more important things than apprehending him or her, yes, our liberty was fought for and died for and now we are giving it away so we can exact revenge on someone who stole a little money. The supreme court said the police could apprehend a suspect, without a warrant, if there was a reasonable reason to do so, if the only evidence the police had was that that the suspect was probably in one of the cars, is that reasonable? Absolutely not!

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yes it was unconstitutional, since Police did not file any charges or have any warrants against any of the 40 people.

    I understand where the Police Chief was coming from and I sympathize, but it was still unconstitutional regardless of the end result.

  • 9 years ago

    What the actions the police took would be considered to be a warrantless arrest and warrantless arrests do pass constitutional muster under some circumstances.

    The Supreme Court has ruled that warrantless arrests can be made when the circumstances make it reasonable to do so. For example, no warrant is required for a felony arrest in a public place, even if the arresting officer had ample time to procure a warrant, so long as the officer possessed probable cause that the suspect committed the crime.

    In this case it is apparent that the police had a virtual certainty that the bank robber was in one of those cars. In fact he was in one of the cars. Not having a full description they did know that he was in one of about 20 cars.

    Would you have felt better if the guy was a murder? The police are there to stop criminal activity and while this was a bit drastic it was effective.

  • 9 years ago

    I would definitely be suing the Aurora Police Department. Colorado has been slipping down the liberal slope for quite awhile now.

    Source(s): Used to live in Widefield and at Fort Carson.
  • 9 years ago

    It sounds pretty normal and is what the blue state governors want

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.