Should there be a litmus test for Y!A Politics question-askers?

It would be interesting to see how many people are truly looking for an answer to a question and how many are trolling to piss every one off with their ignorance and hard headed bias.

It isn't that that Y/A is a looney magnet, but rather that Yahoo censors questions. If you ask a genuine question with any leaning toward the Constitutional values of our nation it is quarnitined in a room where only your contacts can see it if even that. I got several mails the other day "____ just asked a question on Y/A." I clicked on them and they were Ron Paul questions that were over two months old.

Yahoo is a private company, and they have the right to censor our freedom of speech. I have the right to not use their service. I've taken most of my debate efforts to Youtube :)

If we live a free nation, no litmus test, anything goes.

I agree, the questions in here are mostly retarded, still find a few that are answer worthy. This site was much better about five years ago, before all the report monkeys removed the intelligent posters.

There is a limit on answers, and I think that if you block someone for stepping on your toes and report them as well, if you wrongly report them, then you should be banned from posting for a certain period.

They might think twice about such actions.

Erosion is putting it mildly . I've seen better debates in junior high school .

So, Mr. Libertarian, who do you think should be the one to apply this "litmus test" of yours?

Or we could let people express themselves the way they see fit ?

OK. Let's dip you in some urine and see what color you turn.