Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Red Balls galore, explain your answer!?

If you had five red balls that contained four red balls and those red balls contained the original five red balls, then how many sets of sets of balls would I take to have a double set of red balls of varying sizes inside each next largest red ball?

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    dude im trippin out! is there an answer to this question? my guess would be 90

    WAIT! none - at the start you said "If YOU had five red balls" and at the end you said "how many sets.....would I take"

    NONE!!!!!

  • 4 years ago

    There are problems with the great Bang, and creationists do have some option perspectives on the priority. regardless of the undeniable fact that, as with maximum medical uncertainties, there are dissimilar comments even interior the creationist community. My individual sought after is Russell Humphries white hollow cosmology, which states, in short form, that area isn't countless and has an euclidian center, that the introduction of earth exceeded off someplace close to this center, and that at this center there became a great gravity nicely which acted relativistically to sluggish time to a crawl for gadgets close to that center, as destructive to issues very a techniques from that center. using this theory, as quickly as ought to end that the residual results of the stretching out of the fabric of time-area interior the introduction experience is what's inflicting the frequency shift of intergalactic easy in the direction of crimson, no longer organic velocity, as required by using the great Bang. Couple this with the certainty that redshift itself is now being puzzled, by using non-creationist previous universe scientists, concepts you, as to if a doppler result's the superb thank you to describe each and all of the observed documents. As purely one occasion, particle bridges could be seen between quasars and galaxies that, in accordance to the doppler rationalization, could be too a techniques from one yet another for such an result. yet while they are close, because of the fact the bridge exhibits, then 2 issues are solved. First, the observed bridge turns into plausible. 2d, the ability of the quasar turns into useful for its length, because of the fact it rather is definitely plenty closer than doppler theory enables consistent with redshift interpretation. hence, white hollow cosmology does furnish a thank you to describe a number of those irregularities that are no longer available below the great Bang theory. regardless of the undeniable fact that, no longer even creationists regard white hollow cosmology as a finished theory. it rather is novel in that it does no longer take time as a relentless, yet as a relative characteristic of the introduction experience. This opens opportunities that have not been element of the communicate, and that i think of it rather is healthful technology to maintain an open concepts.

  • 9 years ago

    O my u lost me

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Is this a joke or a riddle...

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.