Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

? asked in Science & MathematicsPhysics · 9 years ago

Astronomy/Physics Question?

I have zero knowledge of Astronomy or Physics, but I have always wondered; If we were a few light years away (or any distance) from a pulsing light, would we see the light spread out if it was traveling in gas or dust (or something so we could observe it)? Or, would it illuminate the gas or dust at the same time?

Hopefully somebody understands what Im asking.

Update:

Big Daddy got it. Maybe pulsing light wasnt the best wat to explain my thoughts. Heres another way to ask this question; If somebody flashed an extremely bright laser through dust at a great distance from us, would we see the light travel through the dust?

Update 2:

Thanks Big Daddy

4 Answers

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yes, it's possible, but the situation is rare.

    Unfortunately, most of the time objects are in either relatively dust-free areas (so we don't see the light expanding), or the dust is so heavy that it's difficult to image at all.

    However recent observations have used this effect to give some information about a supernova that wasn't imaged directly. The dust isn't homogeneously arrayed for us to directly see the expanding shell of light, but it is enough for us to gather data on it.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cp4uNnUrCo

    EDIT:

    "If somebody flashed an extremely bright laser through dust at a great distance from us, would we see the light travel through the dust?"

    If the dust was continuous, sure. Different patches would light up at different times. We should be able to map this as the motion of the light.

    I assume you're asking about this because the astronomical distances allow you to see the motion of the light at a more human timescale. But in principle, if you had a fast enough camera, you could do similar things in the laboratory.

    http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/trillion-fps-ca...

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Do you mean a pulsar when you say 'pulsing light'? If so you as an observer with your own eyes would see simply the star itself, and since light travels through the EM field at 'c' you as the observer would see everything illuminate at the same time.

    However due to red-shift and hubble's work we could find evidence for this spreading out of light.

  • 9 years ago

    I suppose you mean to ask if the length of gas or dust would appear to bands of brightness like a type of ripple. Yes and no. Your mind would present the effect because it its logical to you but in reality even if you were going the speed of light, light would still be travelling that much faster. The only reasons we see twinkling stars is because of stuff moving through the light. In the end, if you watched a beam of light travel through gas or dust, the entire thing would seem to dim and brighten as a whole.

  • 9 years ago

    because light get scattered in dusty like medium

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.