Does recycled E-Plastic end up in cheap brittle consumer products that break easy in third world countries?

What’s all this 777 business?

What a load of garbage. It’s complete and utter nonsense.

Did you know that “what a load of garbage” in Starter36 = 777 and that “It’s complete and utter nonsense” in Pythagoras A7 = 777.

When you’ve got 105 different Ultra Alpha Num calculators to go at, it’s not difficult to generate phrases that equate to 777 in one or more of them.

There’s nothing remotely unusual about it, it’s just somebody manipulating numbers, anyone can do it.

You stated that “PLASTIC WASTES NEED BURNED = 777 in x3” but did you know that “DON’T GO BURNING PLASTICS” also = 777 in x3.

Anyway, “plastic wastes need burned” doesn’t make sense. It should be either “plastic waste needs burning” or “plastic waste needs to be burned” – neither of which equate to 777 in any of the calculators.

It looks like the alphanumeric mumbo-jumbo calculator is saying not to burn any plastics.

Personally I’ll stick with something a bit more reliable. I’ll go with the chemistry which tells us it’s bad to burn plastic, and the physics and economics which says we should recycle.

As for the quality of plastic products in the Philippines, this will come down to economics more than anything. Much of the recycled plastics from the Western world get shipped to China where they’re recycled into all sots of things.

The companies producing these goods will create products that will sell best in their target markets. If cheap plastic basins sell in the Philippines then that’s what will get exported there, if the American market demands better quality products then that’s what they’ll get. The average US citizen has 12 times more money then the average Filipino (2011 GDP per capita figures), they can afford better quality products.

What’s all this 777 business?

What a load of garbage. It’s complete and utter nonsense.

Did you know that “what a load of garbage” in Starter36 = 777 and that “It’s complete and utter nonsense” in Pythagoras A7 = 777.

When you’ve got 105 different Ultra Alpha Num calculators to go at, it’s not difficult to generate phrases that equate to 777 in one or more of them.

There’s nothing remotely unusual about it, it’s just somebody manipulating numbers, anyone can do it.

You stated that “PLASTIC WASTES NEED BURNED = 777 in x3” but did you know that “DON’T GO BURNING PLASTICS” also = 777 in x3.

Anyway, “plastic wastes need burned” doesn’t make sense. It should be either “plastic waste needs burning” or “plastic waste needs to be burned” – neither of which equate to 777 in any of the calculators.

It looks like the alphanumeric mumbo-jumbo calculator is saying not to burn any plastics.

Personally I’ll stick with something a bit more reliable. I’ll go with the chemistry which tells us it’s bad to burn plastic, and the physics and economics which says we should recycle.

As for the quality of plastic products in the Philippines, this will come down to economics more than anything. Much of the recycled plastics from the Western world get shipped to China where they’re recycled into all sots of things.

The companies producing these goods will create products that will sell best in their target markets. If cheap plastic basins sell in the Philippines then that’s what will get exported there, if the American market demands better quality products then that’s what they’ll get. The average US citizen has 12 times more money then the average Filipino (2011 GDP per capita figures), they can afford better quality products.

Go here to add these up quick. http://www.666myth.com/ where 666 is not a bivelent myth like the site owner claims it is.

Be careful. I heard about a guy who smoked that stuff you are on. He is locked up on a looney farm.

Are you at all aware of the *crap* that goes into the air from burning plastics?