Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Should the Lockheed R6V Constitution have stayed on the board?

Boeing revolutionized aviation with the Wide Body when power was available. Imagine if the R6V had Fan-jet type power. Without that power they built the Super Connie which was the most beautiful commercial aircraft ever but again, available power beat them, in the form of 707. What would be the state today if the R6V had the power it needed?

Update:

One might consider the XC-99 had it ever lost it's X. However given the problems of the B-36, which it evolved from it wasn't destined to have a viable future. Granted the XC-99 was huge but then so was the Spruce Goose. The R6V on the other hand was an evolution of aerodynamics built at a time we didn't have engines sufficient to punch that much of a hole in the atmosphere.

Amongst my squadron mates were two who were FE's on B-36's. It was best known for an adrenalin maker.

1 Answer

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    I don't think so. Interesting aircraft though, and the full double-decker design was of course finally incorporated in the Airbus 380. Because of the physical size of the Constitution (larger than a B767-200), in those days there were simply too many logistics problems as far as passenger facilities at airports, runways and ramps of inadequate strength, maintenance facilities unable to accommodate it, etc.

    Not that all these things wouldn't have been resolved, since much larger aircraft eventually came along, but the airlines were simply not ready for that kind of technological leap, nor is it likely to have been profitable had adequate power been available. The Brits tried the wide-body concept with the Brabazon. Complete failure.

    The problem with the concept of both designs was operating cost and, as with most things, it came down to the world of the "bean counters" and they couldn't get the numbers to pencil out. Had decent turboshaft or turboprop engines been available, then perhaps they might have been more viable, especially as military transports, but alas, too slow and the 707 would have put them out of business within a dozen years.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.