Should the use of Drones be allowed for domestic surveillance?

They shouldn't be used for domestic surveillance. UAV's could be used for border surveillance, aerial pursuit of fleeing suspects, an aid to firefighters in forest fires and brush fires, and to aid in search and rescue when conditions make it too dangerous for manned aircraft.

As long as they are only used in PUBLIC. You have no "expectation of privacy" in public. Look around some time, pay attention, and you'll see just how many cameras up on poles are ALREADY watching you. It's no different. And, if the government wants to spy on you, then can already easily do it with satellites. Again, as long as it doesn't violate your PRIVACY. How is that different than Walmart watching you in their parking lot, or the freeway cameras?

They already are. By the end of the decade we will be living in a dystopian police state.

No.We are already surveilled enough. Safe to say we will be entering a police state soon.

No. It's a waste of money. In the USA I grew up in it wouldn't be tolerated. Unfortunately, that country is gone.

In certain cases they should, and ARE. However, as with certain things like wire taps, they should be "okayed" by a judge.

“I support the two party system… one on Friday night, and one on Saturday night.” -- HeeHaw

Republican since before she was born… and PROUD of it.

Hello many many local police depts are using them now....they are in the sky

privacy laws are needed now...the military surplus went to local police.....

All the UFO's reports? DRONES...FACT

So now the Tea party detention clause they are fighting to keep in the NDAA? Tea party will abuse them for dictatorship.....

keep up folks your police may have some

Sure

They are going to watch who they want to watch anyway...at least this way we don't have to pay a pilot and a cameraman the high wages of a certified pilot.

It's a fake story.... It doesn't happen - some right wing moron was spreading that one.

I don't believe they should.