Young Offenders Legal Help!!!?

Question

Okay without judging me or anything, please just help me legally. So what happened was that me and my sister got into a argument and it got physical, so I hit her and she hit me and then I got mad, it continued that way when I got really mad to the point where I hit her with a stick that was lying around, and she ran into the balcony, and I hit her on her leg there, then I let go of the stick and she ran inside, and started to hit me and it was pretty ugly but nothing too bad. She ran out of the house, and someone saw me hitting her with the stick which was only once I didn't mean to hit her I just hit her once which was lightly aswell, but all in all it was wrong of me to do so. But onto who saw me, they ended up calling the police and the confiscated the stick and arrested me. My parents came home from work and it was all a mess. But the next day at my bail hearing, I was granted a bail, and my court hearing is next month. The crown prosecutor read the charges at the bail hearing, which were assault with weapon and something really got on my nerves, she said another charge threatening with murder. Now I don't know where that came from but I know for a solid fact that I had never threatened her with murder, I do get into arguments with my sister, but I know that I didn't say that, the supposed witness said that I did. Also, they supposed witness, the person who called the police, said that I was about to throw my sister off the balcony, which is utter bull-sh*t. See this is the problem with my area people just like to exaggerate the story. Never the less it is going to be a factor in the trial. So my father is going to hire a lawyer and I am about to meet with him. I am 15 and my sister 17, the crown prosecutor is taking over to prosecute me. I am an honours student and I have very big hopes for my future, I think I that I did get overly mad which was wrong of me, and hitting my sister was wrong in all causes, it was just that exams were up I was tense, she was hitting me and I snapped. But now this is all over me, I think that my future is jeopardy. Now, what are some possible options for me, and is there a way in which I can get the charges exempted, and not have a record at all, or even worse juvy time, school is coming up and I can't miss a single class, I have to keep my grades up. I am in Canada, and do not have a previous record and do not want to have one in the future. Please help me with some legal advice, I will be speaking to a lawyer but I want some advice from the general public. How can I relieve myself from this mess? All help is appreciated.

Update:

What I also wanted to add is that, one of the police officers that came to my home, got mad on how I hit a girl, and get grabbed me by the shirt and hit my a couple of times, even before there was sufficient evidence of the act being committed by me. Now I want to know if he was allowed to this because none of the other officers dealt with me this way. So I want to know if this can be brought up in court as a matter of injustice committed on me by the officer, as two wrongs don't make a right, and this was not part of his duty, as I believe so. However, is this an issue or was he allowed to do this.

Also I was granted bail in my own home with my sister living there too, so would be a be a factor to consider or anything.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

stand up for your right to party

Anonymous · Answer

Hiring an ATTY is a smart thing and you need evidence that the officer assaulted you have the atty pull his work record and see if he has been written up in past for abusing his authority as for the crime you did have the atty see if you can settle this with community service and anger management classes and pay court cost and fines since it was your first offense. When you get in court don't act so emotional and never show anger when the prosecutor questions you they will try to do this to get the judge see that you had motive and intent and never display that in court.

mcbryde · Answer

It's obviously unconstitutional, and not anything greater than an try to coerce conversions at the aspect of the lawmakers and church buildings worried. There is very little connection among devout religion and failure to dedicate crimes, headquartered at the quantity of persons in jail with a powerful religion in God. Moreover, the truth that there are a restricted quantity of church buildings worried leaves many persons and not using a choices significant to their ideals (or lack thereof) -- and I severely doubt the lawmakers who driven this via might be given a Wiccan coven if one of these organization volunteered. I appear to keep in mind as good that the regulation mandated church attendance on *Sundays*, which de facto excludes any faith whose worship offerings are hung on an extra day (Judaism, any person?). To say not anything of atheists being caught with out an choice in any respect. Regardless of all that, although, the federal government must now not be within the industry of seeking to drive, coerce, or inspire persons to wait any exact church buildings, and even devout offerings quite often. And whilst your handiest choices are church or jail, sure, that is coercion. If they desire to check out anything that is each Constitutionally-sound and honestly amazing, then probably they must institute a few style of remedy or counseling application as an choice to jail -- secular, and honestly significant to the issues they are seeking to cope with. I agree that the judicial approach within the US is a ways too keen on punishment and now not almost worried ample with rehabilitation, however that is the fallacious option to cross approximately it.

Trending News

Young Offenders Legal Help!!!?

3 Answers