What is the difference between "Make no law" and "Shall not be infringed"?

Both mean NO.

And both have been turned to yes, and have been infringed on.

But We vote in them idiots, what to do.

It is a matter of legal wording. Make no law specifically states that no law may be enacted that deals with a matter. Infringed is a bit more in the grey area, allowing for some leeway on the control of something

Exactly ten letters or characters. Those colonials sure knew how to turn a phrase into confusion for us today. Why couldn't they just repeat the same phrase in each amendment and avoid your confusion.

The second amendment gives people the right to own and use muskets, swords, and knives, the weapons that existed when the founding fathers wrote and voted in support of that amendment.

If conservatives insist on the original intent of the founding fathers then they cannot support modern weapons as being allowed by the second amendment as the founding fathers had no idea about rifles, scopes, semi-automatic weapons and such.

shall make no law means they want govt totally out of it

the right to bear arms is a right the document is granting, and its saying that right can't be chipped away

with the law to manage the country.