Which one will happen first: An Atheist becomes "Top Answerer" in R&S or Yahoo! goes out of business?

First, my own experience with Yahoo has been negative.

This question was deleted, and when questioned, this was

totally disregarded, and none of my questions were answered.

Just the 'party line', none of which I saw in my question

which was: Christians, what do you think the goal or work of many atheists is

While I don't think atheists will get into 'the hall of fame', I think I am seeing

more and more Christians either not coming to R & S at all, or else

more 'toxic' atheists coming onto R & S.

They may get their wish, and have it all to themselves. They can

bash away about Christians...we notice they don't do that with

other religions.

I was told once by a wise person....consider the source.

If the source, which is Yahoo is worldly...what else could they be?

Then the bible is clear that 'the world LOVE the world'.

Now with the BQ: We see how smart atheists are on our own questions,

and it will be fun?, interesting? to see the categories

of atheist replies to this question.

There's all kinds of fun. While I would prefer 'happy' fun, I can cope

with 'toxic' fun also. The atheist replies do fall into categories.

I put a few categories in my answer here as I looked at the other atheist replies:

http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ao...

The various ways atheists 'missed' the question entirely was a kind of

'fun' (since there isn't much around) for me to see.

When a section called R & S is allowed to become very 'loose' and

'tawdry', then people won't bother with Yahoo at all.

Yet Yahoo has come up with such a great idea, and to see them

allow it to get tarnished so badly in so many ways, as in

that question I gave you shows a lot to me about the

American Dream.

Top Answerers are almost *always* point gamers like Nous and Lightning. I think the only honest one up there is "ImaCatholic2".

Well,you can't beat the dishonest creationist point gamer(read cheater)....but both Nous and Gotbucket are atheists who happen to be top answerers.

Ignores the pointless empty correlation sans causation.

There is nothing smart about atheist beliefs.

To believe that a natural first cause was able to defy natural laws in order to create the Universe out of nothing is not smart, it is just about as dumb as you can get.

Why would we want to become Top Contributor? I don't need a fancy title as much as you do to feel good about myself.

What do you think