Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

? asked in Arts & HumanitiesHistory · 9 years ago

San Marino and the romans?

I have asked this before and only received answers stating that the roman empire was gone by the time of San Marino's foundation. However the foundation story of Marino states it was founded in the year 301 a.d., well within the years of the empire for those who will attempt to answer this question so no answers saying my question is invalid from someone who thinks they know and get basic dates wrong.

So the question is this, how did Christians manage to form an enclave in the roman heartland completely autonomous from Rome during the Christian persecutions. So again without saying I'm wrong because the Romans wernt around, is the foundation story a myth or if it's true how was San Marino able to maintain its independence from Rome? Geographic defenses can't be the reason as roman armies were able to think of ways to overcome any natural defense (I'm thinking of Masada). So is the foundation story a myth or based in fact and how did they maintain independence from the romans if the story is true.

P.S. The Roman empire, more specifically he western empire, lasted well into the 5th century so poser historians stop saying Rome wasn't around or you just make a fool of yourself. Rome was still in full command of itself at the time of Marino's supposed founding, so if you answer that your dead wrong. So someone who knows help me out.

1 Answer

Relevance
  • 9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Wow. The Roman Empire certainly existed then, but it was in deep turmoil due both to internal and external factors for about a century. The empire was divided in its rule, and from what I understand, Diocletian was focused much more on the eastern part of the empire. It's no secret that he persecuted Christians, but his focus and reach in that area was simply not that far nor effective. So having a small insignificant band run far from where Diocletian was spending his time was indeed effective. Comparing Christians in San Marino to Zealots in Masada is not appropriate, because the Zealots had killed Roman soldiers. I have no doubt that if the Christians were killing soldiers, they'd be taken care of promptly. As it was, Diocletian had bigger fish to fry in the east.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.