Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why is Paul Ryan against earmarks when he got $5 mil for his own state?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Same as Ron Pual and his little slight of hand. Get the earmarks in and then when the budget is sure to be passed, vote no. Political shell games.

  • 9 years ago

    He had 3 "earmark" request, which were all under transportation. Transportation projects are actually funded from the federal government and congress allocates the money to the states. This is a legitimate appropriation of funds, since the Feds are the ones who fund these projects. (that is what your taxes you pay when you get gas are supposed to fund).

    Earmarking and sending money to companies, specific industries, political organizations, or individuals is what people have a problem with. Michelle Bachmann would be a better example of hypocritical rhetoric. Anything outside of transportation or national security should be paid for by the states. The rest should be sent to the states in a block grant for the state to decide. http://www.legistorm.com/earmarks/details/member/8...

  • ?
    Lv 4
    9 years ago

    " Earmarks aren’t inherently problematic, but when former members of Congress are in jail for selling earmarks, there’s something seriously wrong with the process."--Rep. Ryan's website.

    It's the process, not the idea of having them. He cites a couple he believes are wasteful and how he believes the process is corrupt after lawmakers went to prison. Earmarks were only considered bad starting in 2005, unacceptable in 2008. The hypocrisy charges come before 2009. By the way, I personally want earmarks back.

    Source(s): paulryan.house.gov
  • ?
    Lv 5
    9 years ago

    Poor little Small Balls Paul Ryan was not responsible for doing all that evilshit. His Imaginary Evil Twin Eddie Munster took all that cash when poor Small Balls Paul was fast asleep.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    He is against earmarks except his own. Makes perfect sense when all that matters is getting re-elected. Talk the talk,but don't walk the walk.

  • 9 years ago

    because he says what his idiot supporters want to hear since he knows they wont "factcheck" anything.

  • 9 years ago

    And compared to what the democrats have done, thats chump change.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Ah, and the demonization starts. You can say the same about that old white hag that Obama tries to hide so he doesn't say anything embarrassing.

  • 9 years ago

    Why don't you ask actual questions instead of wasting people's time?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.