Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Strong force potential dependence on color charge?
I have found this formula for the potential of the strong force between quarks:
V(r) = −(4/3)α(r)ℏc / r + kr
However, nothing is mentioned about color. The above is always attractive. It seems to me, for sets of three color charges to neutralize, the effect between some pair must be repulsive.
Let's assume we're in the range where the +kr term dominates. So V(r) ~= kr. The force on a test quark, which let's say has green color, from a hadron of balanced colors, should be zero. So my guess is that k is different for different pairs of colors, and negative for some pair.
Vtot(r) = k[rg]r + k[gg]r + k[bg]r
= (k[rg] + k[gg] + k[bg])r
k[rg] + k[gg] + k[bg] = 0 so that force is zero.
Possible solutions:
k[rg] > 0
k[gg] = -2k[rg] = -2k[bg]
Unlike colors attract, and like colors repel twice as strongly.
k[rg] < 0
k[gg] = -2k[rg] = -2k[bg]
Unlike colors repel, and like colors attract twice as strongly. But that's inconsistent with a hadron holding together, since each quark is affected only by unlike color quarks.
k[rg] =/= k[bg]
For example
k[rg] > 0
k[gg] = -k[rg]
k[bg] = 0
That is red and green quarks attract, like quarks repel, and blue quarks have no effect on green quarks. It seems wrong and also it turns out it's impossible to get a neutral effect on all colors of test quarks unless the red-red and/or blue-blue coupling constants are different from the green-green, which seems even more wrong. The same is true even if k[bg] is not zero but is any value different from k[rg].
I know that color is not a permanent property of quarks and that they change color as they interact, but I'm not really sure what to make of that. I also don't understand non-abelian gauge groups or whatever, so if that is the only way to explain the problem, never mind.
Is there any sense to my idea that k[gg] = -2k[rg] = -2k[bg]?
1 Answer
- xezlecLv 59 years agoFavorite Answer
Quantum chromodynamics (the subject you're talking about) is WAY more complicated than that. It's not like electromagnetics; you can't just think of it in terms like "like colors attract" or something. The inside of a proton is an immensely complicated soup of gluons and extra quarks and antiquarks popping in and out of existence and interacting with each other in ways that are very hard to calculate mathematically. In fact, it's only very recently that someone was able to finally calculate the potential energy of the "color forces" between the three quarks in the proton. It took a lot of work and big computer simulations.
The correct equation for the color force is its field theory Lagrangian. There is no simple classical analogy for it that I know of. I sure as heck don't understand it. For example, there are 8 types of gluons (versus only one type of photon) and they interact with each other (photons don't). So it's a force that comes in 8 flavors and the actual force itself ties itself in knots attracting and/or repelling itself! That's pretty darn hard to picture...
Sorry I can't be of more help, but QCD is definitely over my head.