Why do liberals portray limited, Constitutional government as "the dark ages"?

What passes for conservatism these days looks more like an exclusive right wing, religious party.

pondering i'm no longer able to force 15 miles in Houston without seeing a intercourse toy shop i'm exceptionally specific that regulation ranks authentic up with all of the different old regulations that are on the books yet in no way enforced in states around the country. The shape provides potential to the states to make regulations in step with public opinion and the opportunity of the persons to circulate with somebody else if regulations are being enforced that they do no longer consider. the undertaking comes whilst the federal government steps in and makes judgements for the total u . s . a . making it perplexing to verify what the electorate somewhat choose. Ever observe how many of the significant matters debated through electorate are matters the place the final courtroom has made ruling that could desire to have been left to the states?

You have to prove it ever existed, before one could even argue that it was related to any other historic "age"...

But seeing as your avatar has the words "End the Fed" in it, I'll give you a thinker:

The richest man in 1913 was Rockefeller. He was worth an inflation-adjusted $500 billion.

The average income was an inflation-adjusted $15,000.

Today the richest U.S citizen is Gates, at an estimated $59 billion.

The average income is $45,000.

Now, you tell me, does having a class or enormously rich political and financial leaders, and an underclass of desperately poor working for them sound closer to the dark ages, to you?

Federal Government for ever

You know current thinking about the dark ages is that it was a lot more intellectually reformist than those Christian scholars of the time wrote about, right?

Most of the modern states in western Europe trace their histories back to those times, so people must have been doing SOMETHING right.