Ok Athiests, I have evidence that might prove you wrong scientifically?

You forgot "CHECKMATE"

>_>; We're a sarcastic bunch.

This argument has been used before, even if it has a pair issues. first of all, if you're going to apply the best judgment that something has means became created through god, then what you're saying is something it extremely is prepared must be created. regrettably, if it really is your good judgment, then using an similar good judgment, something would have had to create god. in case you turn round and say that god became always, then through that similar reasoning, there is not any reason that the universe couldn't be always and is in basic terms cyclical in some trend (ie. no starting up). you could't in basic terms say that this logical argument can in fact be used to brush aside technology yet no longer god, it must be consistent in both cases to seen a logical argument. so a concepts as order and complexity is going, there is not any reason obtainable that means that order and complexity would not evidently variety. All you may want to do is seem at any immediately line shaped in nature, or a circle, or the bonds of an atom. human beings will attempt to attraction to analogies between watches, or another man made merchandise and say the way it would not seem organic, and we ought to note of it as being something built through an intelligence. yet this argument breaks down because we note of that something isn't organic. This argument is attempting to assert that nature itself isn't organic, which also would not make sense (there is numerous different holes in this good judgment, yet I"m now unlikely to move over all of them). I comprehend why your argument can look compelling, yet no longer agreeing with it would not make someone obdurate and unreasonable, the priority is the best judgment would not delay once you commence attempting to stay with it to the argument as an finished. It will change into very tautological, which in itself invalidates the argument.

Nothing is worse than active ignorance. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

"When I was a child I spoke as a child I understood as a child I thought as a child; but when I became a man I put away childish things." I Cor. xiii. 11.

u know what the difference is? i choose to believe what i believe and accept that u have that same freedome and not be intollerent towards u even though i completley disagree with u.... "what would ur jesus do?" judge? maybe u should really read that bible u think u follow "christian" :)

“You’re allowed to believe in a god. You’re allowed to believe unicorns live in your shoes for all I care. But the day you start telling me how to wear my shoes so I don’t upset the unicorns, I have a problem with you. The day you start involving the unicorns in making decisions for this country, I have a BIG problem with you.” -Matthew Shultz

“You are entitled to your opinion. But you are NOT entitled to your own facts.” -Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan

Awww. I was looking forward to reading an amusing paragraph full of "evidence".

How dare you believe in something I don't. I'm offended.

Would have surprised me if you did.