Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Society & CultureReligion & Spirituality · 9 years ago

Is the mere existence of young earth creationists the only credible evidence to disprove evolution?

12 Answers

Relevance
  • ?
    Lv 7
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    The evidence for evolution is and has been interpreted from a Philosophical and ideological Bias, The answers given by adherents to Evolution here in R&S is proof of the bias and agenda, Atheism has to have an alternate explanation—other than a Creator—for how the universe and life came into existence.

    Darwin once identified himself as a Christian but as a result of some tragedies that took place in his life, he later renounced the Christian faith and the existence of God. Evolution was invented by an atheist.

    What is sad is that Christians are falling into this Trap and trying to fit evolution into the Bible (Theistic Evolution) thinking they can make it fit.

    Lee Stroble in his video listed below “ The Case for the Creator” stated (5 min. 28 sec into the video) The Case for a Creator

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=%E2%80%A6

    That “There is no way you can Harmonize Neo Darwinism with Christianity, I could never understand Christians who would say “ Well I believe in God yet I believe in Evolution as well” You see Darwin’s idea about the development of life led to his theory that modern science now generally defines as an undirected process completely devoid of any purpose or plan,”. Now how could God direct an undirected process? How could God have purpose in a plan behind a system that has no plan and no purpose? It just does not make sense.

    It didn’t make sense to me in 1966 and it doesn’t make sense to me now.

    The Apostle Paul wrote to His Son Timothy stating that “ in 2 Timothy 4:3-4 “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, [because] they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn [their] ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.”

    Those Christians who believe in evolution have no idea how that effects their theology.

    What is theistic evolution?

    http://www.gotquestions.org/theistic-evolution.htm...

    http://carm.org/secular-movements/evolution/theist...

    Eternity is a Long Time to be wrong about this

    What Hath Darwin Wrought?

    http://www.whathathdarwinwrought.com/

    Darwin's Deadly Legacy (1 of 7)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mxXICZ9mXo

    Darwin & Eugenics....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuTPHvedOOU&feature...

    Creation In The 21st Century - Planet Earth Is Special 1 of 3

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk8xtXRI6OE

    Creation in the 21st Century - The Evidence Disputes Darwin 1 of 3

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaveDbWrQuQ&feature...

    Some modern scientists who have accepted the biblical account of Creation

    http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/

    More than 600 Scientist with PHD’s who have Signed A SCIENTIFIC DISSENT FROM DARWINISM

    http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-do...

  • NDMA
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    There is no need to disprove that which has not been proven. The best evidence for evolution is anecdote and inference.

    The actual formation of novel phenotypes due to natural selection has never been observed or experimentally produced.

    The actual formation of novel alleles due to an accumulation of mutations have never been observed or experimentally produced.

    When one has observational or experimental evidence of these hypothetical phenomena then you can argue evolution is possible - so far one cannot even say that based on the objective evidence! As result there is nothing to disprove!

    CHRIS: They have observed natural selection one of several mechanisms of evolution that nobody disagrees with. I gave two specific hypothetical mechanisms necessary for evolution to explain the diversity of life in the biosphere neither of which has been observed or experimentally produced. You response is a non-sequitur A and B are true therefore C and D are also true despite there being no evidence. Now get you ba ba and go to bed the grown ups are talking!

  • EAH
    Lv 7
    9 years ago

    Yes.

    Evolution never been proven wrong.

    The only people who oppose it are creationists

    of various religious faiths.

    Who are literal believers in religious texts.

    Who are a danger to the civilized world,

    Creationists are TERRORISTS.

  • 9 years ago

    I love Gregory's obvious quote mine. Go ahead buddy read the rest of that sentence. And for your second article, that only found a new way of looking at it so the science can improve, lmao good try buddy. P.S. Don't post links to "disprove" something with an article leading to a new discovery of the topic you are trying to disprove.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 9 years ago

    Lack of evolution wouldn't disprove evolution.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    easily, they both are attainable. some challenge would have planted the seeds of existence in the international, and we were created and that challenge that created us, we'd want to call god. in that senerio, the position did god come from and what's god? he might want to be a million. an alien which some also call god 2. a stress which some also call god 3. the earth did which some also call god. so all in all, its all attainable

  • 9 years ago

    no

    there is lots of evidence to disprove evolution

    here are two examples

    http://www.kval.com/news/local/84275777.html

    New study suggests birds did not evolve from dinosaurs

    CORVALLIS, Ore - For years, science books have said that birds likely evolved from ground-dwelling dinosaurs.

    A new study published in the Proceedings of the Naitonal Academy of Sciences suggests birds didn't come from dinosaurs and came from feathered gliders instead.

    "Clearly dinosaurs are related to birds but probably not in the seemless fashion they have been presented," says John Ruben, a professor of zoology at Oregon State University.

    encode study refutes junk dna myth

    http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/news/science/s...

    But the key finding disproved that 98 percent of the human genome was junk DNA -- DNA that serves no apparent biological purpose. Instead, Dr. Green said, ENCODE shows that 80 percent of the genome has some biological function with expectations that, in time, the entire genome might be proven to play a biological role.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Evolution is a fact and as such is unquestionable, creationists are just morons.

  • 9 years ago

    Creationists, credible?

    Hahahahaha, good one.

    NDMA,

    They have observed evolution you in imbecile. Well it's obvious you're not the adult you twat.

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Your evolution his a sad Joke it did not create all life forms better luck next time

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.