Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Pro life or pro choice? Massive ignorant cannibalism or illegal butchering of fetus that is dangerous for?
mother?
I have a moral dilemma. On one hand if abortion is illegal then women wouldn't even talk to her parents and get illegal operation that is risky. On the other hand it isn't profitable not to use fetal cells for production, and it's used in many soft drinks and vaccines.
List is here, if some don't know already:
I would go for Vulcan: "needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" so it's pro life, or pro choice if person see the fetus burns.
Third on the list. Where you cheating?
Dawñ indeed :) . If there is no need for abortion then there isn't any problem. I bet the solution was here before problem was even here lol. Meanwhile I cannot find word disgusting enough for this. One people say it's satanism, although satanism has much higher morals that this
2 Answers
- Anonymous9 years agoFavorite Answer
softdrinks huh ... i hope its not in mountain dew ... but really abortion is part of eugenics and planned population control coupled with social engineering .. first they promote massive cultural contamination through promiscuosness to keep people from long-term bonding while at the same time providing a solution for the 'problems' that arise ... understand your puppet masters ..
- John SLv 79 years ago
Well.. when you create a false dichotomy like THAT...
Ya know.. one definition of intelligence that I recently heard was:
"The ability to summarize BOTH sides of the argument in a fair way, so that even your opponent agrees that you have been fair."
Do you think you've fairly summarized both sides arguments in a way that either one would agree with you?
The REASON for abortion is not merely to stop women from having illegal abortions. The issue is a bit more complicated then that.
Secondly, morally speaking, one can not use 'profitability' from something that is immoral. That in and of itself is a moral issue.
For most Philosophers and Theologians that deal with Morality.. have a huge issue with this. For one.. the fact that there is now a secondary market and derived value for aborted human lives drums up all sorts of red flags. Could medical industry be pressured to supply a certain amount of fetal stem cells for our cosmetics and research?
Could planned pregnancy and Doctors actually council women to GET abortions that are NOT in their best interest (that idea itself is seen as a contradiction by some) simply to supply more fetal stem cells.
And WHY would we use this to justify abortion when there are now Adult stem cells, available?
Most of these aborted fetal lines are from decades ago.. and therefore are reaching the end of their viability. Why not switch to using adult stem cells, instead?
So.. the issue is MUCH more complex then you the simple black n white choice you list.
