Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Derivatives that cycle?

I am looking for more examples of derivatives that "cycle", and the technical term for this phenomenon if there is one.

Now, the second, fourth, sixth, ect derivatives of -e^x are -e^x.

Likewise, the 4th, 8th, 12th, ect derivatives of sin(x) are sin(x).

sinhx and coshx also have a looping pattern of 2.

are there any other examples of this, especially with cycle lengths of more than four?

2 Answers

Relevance
  • kb
    Lv 7
    9 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    We are looking for solutions to y^(n) = y.

    ==> y^(n) - y = 0, a homogeneous linear differential equation of order n.

    This has characteristic equation r^n - 1 = 0.

    ==> r = ω^k, where ω = e^(2πi/n) and k = 0, 1, 2, ..., n-1.

    [These are the n- nth roots of unity.]

    So, the general solution is y = C₁ e^x + C₂ e^(ωx) + ... + C_n e^(ω^(n-1) x).

    --------------------

    Let's look at a few special cases:

    (i) n = 1 ==> y' = y.

    This has general solution y = Ce^x (as we already know).

    --------------

    (ii) n = 2 ==> y'' = y. (Note that the square roots of unity are -1 and 1.)

    So, this has general solution y = C₁ e^x + C₂ e^(-x).

    (That is, e^x and e^(-x) have cycle length 2.)

    However, since sinh x = (1/2)(e^x - e^(-x)) and cosh x = (1/2)(e^x + e^(-x)),

    we are just rewriting the general solution above in terms of sinh x and cosh x:

    y = A cosh x + B sinh x.

    --------------

    (iii) n = 3 ==> y''' = y. (Note that the cube roots of unity are 1, (-1 ± i√3)/2)

    So, this has general solution y = C₁ e^x + C₂ e^((-1 + i√3)x/2) + C₃ e^((-1 - i√3)x/2).

    (In particular, e^((-1 ± i√3)x/2) have cycle length 3.)

    However, note that by Euler's Identity

    e^((-1 ± i√3)x/2)

    = e^(-x/2) * e^(±ix√3/2)

    = e^(-x/2) * [cos(x√3/2) ± i sin(x√3/2)]

    = e^(-x/2) cos(x√3/2) ± i e^(-x/2) sin(x√3/2)

    So, we can rewrite the general solution as

    y = Ae^x + Be^(-x/2) cos(x√3/2) + Ce^(-x/2) sin(x√3/2).

    So, e^(-x/2) cos(x√3/2) and e^(-x/2) sin(x√3/2) are real function which cycles in 3.

    --------------

    (iv) n = 4 ==> y'''' = y. (Note that the 4th roots of unity are 1, -1, i, and -i.)

    So, this has general solution y = C₁ e^x + C₂ e^(-x) + C₃ e^(ix) + C₄ e^(-ix).

    (In particular, e^(ix) and e^(-ix) have cycle length 4.)

    However, since sin x = (1/(2i))(e^(ix) - e^(-ix)) and cos x = (1/2)(e^(ix) + e^(-ix)), along with the hyperbolic functions, we can rewriting the general solution as

    y = A cosh x + B sinh x + C cos x + D sin x.

    --------------

    We can keep looking at this for n = 5, 6, ... for more functions of this special type.

    (n = 6, 8, 12 have nice answers, too.)

    ==============

    Another approach is to use power series:

    If y = Σ(k = 0 to ∞) x^(nk+r)/(nk+r)! for any fixed r = 0, 1, 2, ..., n-1,

    then y^(n) = y as well.

    In fact, one can check that

    Σ(k = 0 to ∞) x^(nk)/(nk)! = (1/n)(e^x + e^(ωx) + e^(ω^2 x) + ... + e^(ω^(n-1) x)).

    Its derivatives will give the other n-1 series above.

    (These series give another way of expressing the general solution to y^(n) = y

    but with real coefficients as the imaginary portions of the exponentials cancel out.)

    I hope this helps!

  • 9 years ago

    As you know, the e^x cycles in a pattern of 1.

    e^-x is is compound function (more specifically a horizontal reflection) involving e^x.

    sin(x), cos(x) as well as sinh(x) and cosh(x), can all be written as a function involving e^x.

    Example: sin(x) = (e^ix - e^-ix) / 2i

    Notice that the involvement of e^ix, and of e^-ix, and of i, is what makes it a four-cycle pattern.

    sinh(x) = (e^x - e^-x) / 2 is a two-pattern.

    All because of the properties of e^x, and hence there is nothing unique about sin(x) that is not already accounted for by e^x.

    One could conceivable construct any number of functions involving the sums and differences of e^ax, for various values of 'a', to create unique cycling patterns.

    Notice that f(x) = 0 is the most trivial case of a 1-pattern-cycle.

    I would also like to introduce you to a new topic called Fractional Calculus, if you dont already know about it. Imagine taking a half-derivative. Or a third-derivative. Such that it takes two half-derivatives, or three third-derivatives, to create a full derivative. Interesting idea? By taking half-derivatives, you double the cycling pattern... or third-derivatives, you triple the pattern... e^x can be third-differentiated three times in order to arrive back at the original function. For sin(x), it would take twelve third-derivatives.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.